Capital Transit Co. v. Underwood, 338 U.S. 947 (1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Capital Transit Co. v. Underwood, 338 U.S. 947 (1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
152 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Terpstra v. State (indctapp, 1988-10-20) · Strongest negative: Rural Housing Alliance v. United States Department of Agriculture (cadc, 1974-09-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Rural Housing Alliance v. United States Department of Agriculture
D.C. Cir. · 1974 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see note 16 infra. 8 . 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950). 9 .
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. David Leibowitz (2×)
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Warren v. United States, 177 F.2d 596, 598 (10 Cir. 1949), cert. denied 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Terpstra v. State (4×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 1988 · confidence medium
Id. at 597-598.
discussed Cited "see" Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Haugland
Tex. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Halle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 175 F.2d 500, 502 (2nd Cir.1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 586 (1950) (holding that the federal income tax system is one of self-assessment by the taxpayer); 26 U.S.C. § 61 (a)(West Supp.l998)(definition of gross income); 26 U.S.C. § 6001 (West 1989)(requiring any person hable for tax imposed to keep records, render statements, and make returns); 26 U.S.C. § 6011 (West 1989 and West Supp.l998)(requiring any person hable for tax imposed to make a return or statement according to the prescribed forms and reg…
discussed Cited "see" Sawhney v. Mobil Oil Corp.
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir.1949) (permitting a manufacturer to sell some of its products through a wholesaler at a lower price and some of its goods to a retailer at a higher price), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
discussed Cited "see" National Information Services, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. Trw, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Credit Bureau Reports, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, National Information Services, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Credit Data of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois Corporation Informative Research, Inc., a California Corporation Cdb Infotek, a California Corporation v. Trw, Inc., an Ohio Corporation Credit Bureau Reports, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith, 47 F.3d at 99-100 , (citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975), and Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950)).
discussed Cited "see" National Information Services, Inc. v. TRW, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith, 47 F.3d at 99-100 , (citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975), and Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950)).
discussed Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Rath Packing Company
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
"A party who has obtained some relief usually will be considered the 'prevailing party' ... even if it has not succeeded on all of its claims." Superturf, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 660 F.2d 1275, 1287 (8th Cir.1981); see Coyne Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board, 717 F.2d 385, 390 (7th Cir.1983). " '[T]he prevailing party is prima facie entitled to costs and it is incumbent upon the losing party to overcome that presumption ... [because] denial of costs is in the nature of a penalty for some defection ... in the course of the litigation.' " Walters v. Roadway Express, Inc., 557 F.2d 521, 526 (…
discussed Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rath Packing Co.
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
“A party who has obtained some relief usually will be considered the ‘prevailing party’ ... even if it has not succeeded on all of its claims.” Superturf, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 660 F.2d 1275, 1287 (8th Cir.1981); see Coyne Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board, 717 F.2d 385, 390 (7th Cir.1983). “ ‘[T]he prevailing party is prima facie entitled to costs and it is incumbent upon the losing party to overcome that presumption ... [because] denial of costs is in the nature of a penalty for some defection ... in the course of the litigation.’ ” Walters v. Roadway Express, Inc., 557…
cited Cited "see" Kotsonis v. Superior Motor Express
M.D.N.C. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 177 F.2d 360, 362 (4th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 484 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950) (power to transfer is broadly construed).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Fred Bertram (2×)
10th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Warren v. United States, 177 F.2d 596, 599 (10th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950). 2 .
discussed Cited "see" Esso Standard (Libya), Inc. v. SS Wisconsin
S.D. Tex. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. den., 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950) ; Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 819 (6th Cir. 1968); Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Welch, 269 F.2d 142, 146 (6th Cir. 1959).
discussed Cited "see" Cummings v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Louis Halle, 7 T.C. 245 (1946) , affd. 175 F. 2d 500 (C.A. 2, 1949), certiorari denied 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S. Ct. 485 (1950) ; Myrtle Berlin [Dec. 26,789], 42 T.C. 355 (1964) ; Kalil v. Commissioner, 271 F. 2d 550 (C.A. 5, 1959), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; J.
cited Cited "see" Slater v. Cannon
D.C. · 1952 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 7 Cir., 176 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 .
discussed Cited "see" Amoroso v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1st Cir. · 1952 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 175 F.2d 500 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 586 ; Seaside Improvement Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir, 105 F.2d 990 , certiorari denied 308 U.S. 618 , 60 S.Ct. 263 , 84 L.Ed. 516 ; Foss v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1 Cir., 75 F.2d 326 ; Powell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1 Cir., 94 F.2d 483 ; St.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sun Ship, Inc. v. Lehman
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also cases cited in Baez dissent at 23-30. . 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950). . id. at 11. .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Schaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Barker (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Okamoto v. United States, 152 F.2d 905 (10th Cir. 1945) with Warren v. United States, 177 F.2d 596, 600 (10th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bernard L. Barker, A/K/A Frank or Fran Carter, United States of America v. Eugenio R. Martinez, A/K/A Gene or Jene Valdes, United States of America v. Frank A. Sturgis, A/K/A Frank Angelo Fiorini, A/K/A Edward J. Hamilton,a/k/a Joseph Dialberto or D'alberto, United States of America v. Virgilio R. Gonzalez, A/K/A Raul or Raoul Godoy or Goboy (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Okamoto v. United States, 152 F.2d 905 (10th Cir. 1945) with Warren v. United States, 177 F.2d 596, 600 (10th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Benjamin Spock, United States of America v. Michael Ferber, United States of America v. Mitchell Goodman, United States of America v. William Sloane Coffin, Jr. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1969 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Holdridge v. United States, 8 Cir., 1960, 282 F.2d 302, 310-311 , and Kiyoshi Okamoto v. United States, 10 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 905 , with Lantis v. United States, 9 Cir., 1950, 186 F.2d 91, 92-93 , and Warren v. United States, 10 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 596, 600 , cert. denied 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Spock (2×)
1st Cir. · 1969 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Holdridge v. United States, 8 Cir., 1960, 282 F.2d 302, 310-311 , and Kiyoshi Okamoto v. United States, 10 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 905 , with Lantis v. United States, 9 Cir., 1950, 186 F.2d 91, 92-93 , and Warren v. United States, 10 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 596, 600 , cert. denied 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. James M. Pennington, Crossplaintiffs-Appellants v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. James M. Pennington, Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. Harry P. Stansberry, Individually and T/a Stansberry Coal Company, Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. Jesse C. Fesler and Nola Fesler, Individually and T/a Fesler Coal Company, Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Corss John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. U. R. Arnold and Mrs. U. R. Arnold, Individually and T/a Arnold Strip Mining Company, a Partnership, and the Arnold Coal Company, Inc., Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross Defendant- John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. Tennco, Incorporated, Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross John L. Lewis, Josephine Roche and Henry G. Schmidt, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund v. E. C. McPherson Individually and T/a E. C. McPherson Coal Company, M. W. Norquest and E. C. McPherson Individually and T/a McPherson Coal Company, Cross v. United Mine Workers of America, Cross Dean Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America, W. R. Parton D/B/A W. R. Parton Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America
6th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. Pennington
6th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1949), cert, denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Capital Transit Co.
v.
Underwood
No. 475.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 6, 1950.
338 U.S. 947
George D. Horning, Jr. for petitioner. Foster Wood for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colum[*948] bia Circuit. Certiorari denied.

George D. Horning, Jr. for petitioner. Foster Wood for respondent.