green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Killian v. Kinzer
See Thomas v. Denny’s, Inc., 111 F.3d 1506, 1511 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 *70 S.Ct. 626, 139 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997) (plaintiff shows that improper reason was a substantial motivating factor when he presents testimony that he was not considered for promotion because of his discrimination complaint.) The proffered evidence of a retaliatory motive in this case is direct and not circumstantial.
discussed
Cited "see"
La-Z-Boy Chair Co. v. Hinds
The same impact, that is, the necessity of a bona fide dispute existing before an accord and satisfaction can be accomplished by payment is Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker Corp. (CCA 7, 1948), 171 F.2d 248 , cert. den. 337 U.S. 915 , 69 S.Ct. 1155 , 93 L.Ed. 1725 , which propounded: Accord and satisfaction must be based upon a compromise in good faith of unliquidated or disputed demands where there is an honest difference between the parties as to the amount due. [p. 252] Of this same impact is Eckert-Fair Construction Co. v. Capitol Steel and Iron Co. (CCA 5, 1949), 178 F.2d 338 , cert. …
cited
Cited "see"
National Water Carriers Ass'n v. United States
See Holmes v. United StateS) D.C.S.D.N.Y., 89 F.supp. 894, affirmed 339 U.S. 927 , 70 S.Ct. 628 , 94 L.Ed. 1348 ; Refrigerated Transport v. United States, D.C.N.D.Tex., 101 F.Supp. 95 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kafes
(2×)
See United States v. Croes-sant, 3 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 96 , certio-rari denied, 1950, 339 U.S. 927 , 70 S.Ct. 626 , 94 L.Ed. 1348 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pannell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1950.
David Berger and Thomas D. McBride for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle and Ellis N. Slack for the United States. Reported below: 178 F. 2d 98.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioner.