Adkins v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 339 U.S. 935 (1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Adkins v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 339 U.S. 935 (1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
92 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc. (pawd, 1982-01-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc.
W.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anheuser-Busch v. DuBois Brewing Co., 175 F.2d 370 (3d Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 934 , 70 S.Ct. 664 , 94 L.Ed. 1353 (1950). 3.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald A. Mayersohn
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Gordon v. United States, 178 F.2d 896 (6th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 935 , 70 S.Ct. 664 , 94 L.Ed. 1353 (1950).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Darryl Woods v. Raymond Booker
6th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rather, “[a] new trial is required if ‘the false testimony could ... in any reasonable likelihood have affected the judgment of the jury.’ ” Id. (quoting Napue, 79 S.Ct. at 1178 ); see also Gordon v. United States, 178 F.2d 896, 900 (6th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 935 , 70 S.Ct. 664 , 94 L.Ed. 1353 (1950) (asking whether, “without [the false testimony] the jury might have reached a different conclusion”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Towers v. Titus (2×)
N.D. Cal. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Johnson v. Gardner, 179 F.2d 114 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 935 , 70 S.Ct. 661 , 94 L.Ed. 1353 (1950); Hyde Properties v. McCoy, supra; Senchal v. Carroll, 394 F.2d 797 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 979 , 89 S.Ct. 448 , 21 L.Ed. 440 (1968); Damsky v. Zavatt, 289 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1961); Mission Bay Campland, Inc. v. Sumner Financial Corp., 72 F.R.D. 464 (M.D.Fla.1976); Conn v. Kohlemann, 2 F.R.D. 514 (E.D.Pa.1942); Williams v. Collier, 32 F.Supp. 321 (E.D.Pa.1940); 9 Wright & Miller § 2311 at 53-54; 5 Moore ¶38.30[4] at 228-29. 10 The reason for this freque…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adkins, Administratrix
v.
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
No. 382, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 10, 1950.
339 U.S. 935
John W. Porter, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States, respondent, waived the right to file reply to the petition., G. C. Spillers for the Du Pont Co., respondent.
Published

Certiorari denied.