green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.
(2×)
“Accordingly, failure to convey these earnings accurately, if the discrepancy is at all substantial, has to be material to the person being misled.” 483 F.2d at 551 ; see Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co., 195 F.2d 838, 840 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 856 , 73 S.Ct. 89 , 97 L.Ed. 664 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,206 A.D.M. Corp. v. Arthur J. Thomson, Frost Controls, Inc. v. General Electronics, Inc., Third-Party United Electronics Company v. Arthur J. Thomson, Frost Controls, Inc. v. General Electronics, Inc., Third-Party A.D.M. Corp. v. Arthur J. Thomson, Frost Controls, Inc., Third-Party v. General Electronics, Inc., Third-Party
Compare Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co., 195 F.2d 838, 843 (2d Cir.) (A. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 856 , 73 S.Ct. 89 , 97 L.Ed. 664 (1952), with Judson v. Buckley, 130 F.2d 174, 179-80 (2d Cir.) (A. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 679 , 63 S.Ct. 161 , 87 L.Ed. 545 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.D.M. Corp. v. Thomson
Compare Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co., 195 F.2d 838, 843 (2d Cir.) (A. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 856 , 73 S.Ct. 89 , 97 L.Ed. 664 (1952), with Judson v. Buckley, 130 F.2d 174, 179-80 (2d Cir.) (A. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 679 , 63 S.Ct. 161 , 87 L.Ed. 545 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David B. Dale v. Henry P. Rosenfeld, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Henry P. Rosenfeld Co., Samson Wallach and Abraham S. Gechtman
Hughes v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 56 , 174 F.2d 969, 976 ; see also Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co., 2 Cir., 195 F.2d 838, 843-844 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 856 , 73 S.Ct. 89 , 97 L.Ed. 664 . 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wottle, Administrator
v.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
v.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 95.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1952.
John L. Laskey for petitioner., E. C. Iden for respondent.
Published
Certiorari, 343 U. S. 963, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cir[*851] cuit. Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
John L. Laskey for petitioner. E. C. Iden for respondent.