Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Travel & Tour Service, Inc. v. United States (wied, 1969-06-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Travel & Tour Service, Inc. v. United States
E.D. Wis. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Bingler Vacation Tours v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 793 (N.J.1955), affirmed 350 U.S. 921 , 76 S.Ct. 211 , 100 L.Ed. 806 .
cited Cited "see" Reyes ex rel. Martinez v. Neeley
5th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gonzales v. Landon, 1955, 350 U.S. 920 , 76 S.Ct. 210 .
discussed Cited "see" Lee Hon Lung v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of America (2×)
9th Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gonzales v. Llandon, 350 U.S. 920 , 76 S.Ct. 210 , 100 L.Ed. 806 ; Mitsugi Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 129 , 78 S.Ct. 612 , 2 L.Ed.2d 659 . 11 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Theodore Caldes and Wellaine M. Lowery
9th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir., 1955), cert. den. 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 reh. den. 350 U.S. 926 , 76 S.Ct. 210 , 100 L.Ed. 810 (1955); United States v. Sweeney, 262 F.2d 272 (3rd Cir. 1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc. And Henry F. Price v. Civil Aeronautics Board
9th Cir. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bingler Vacation Tours, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 793, 798 (D.N.J.1955), affirmed 350 U.S. 921 , 76 S.Ct. 211 , 100 L.Ed. 806 ; Brady Transfer & Storage Co. v. United States, 80 F.Supp. 110, 118 (S.D.Iowa 1948), affirmed 335 U.S. 875 , 69 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed. 418 . 35 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzales
v.
Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 111.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1955.
350 U.S. 920
A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Fred Okrand. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop. Briefs of amici curiae were filed by John W. Willis for Mendoza-Martinez, and by Osmond K. Fraenkel and Loren Miller for the American Civil Liberties Union.
Cited by 44 opinions  |  Published

[*920] Cer-tiorari, 349 U. S. 943, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued December 7-8, 1955. Decided December 12, 1955.

Per Curiam:

The Court is of the view that the standard of proof required in denaturalization cases (see Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118; Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665) is applicable to expatriation cases arising under § 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1137, as amended, and has not been satisfied in this case. Accordingly the judgment below is reversed without reaching the constitutional questions that have been presented.