green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. State
In Mississippi, a legally competent defendant is one “(1) who is able to perceive and understand the nature of the proceedings; (2) who is able to rationally communicate with his attorney about the case; (3) who is able to recall relevant facts; (4) who is able to testify in his own defense if appropriate; and (5) whose ability to satisfy the foregoing criteria is commensurate with the severity and complexity of the case.” Howard v. State, 701 So.2d 274, 280 (Miss.1997) (overruled on other grounds) (citation omitted); see Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Caldwell
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); see also State v. Hunt, 615 N.W.2d 294 (Minn.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Durgan v. State
(2×)
See Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 , 86 S.Ct. 836 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966) (citing Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956)); Ex parte Hagans, 558 S.W.2d 457, 460-61 (Tex. Crim.App.1977); Casey v. State, 924 S.W.2d 946, 949 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (sentencing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nakeesha Durgan v. State
See Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 , 86 S.Ct. 836 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966) (citing Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956)); Ex parte Hagans, 558 S.W.2d 457, 460-61 (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miller
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 , 86 S.Ct. 836, 838 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966) (conviction of an incompetent defendant is unconstitutional).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williamson v. Reynolds
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956) (per curiam decision summarily vacating the judgment and remanding to district court for a competency hearing); Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 , 86 S.Ct. 836, 838 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Corethers
See Bishop v. United States (1956), 350 U.S. 961 [ 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 ].
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Dugger
The test insures that an incompetent person will not be tried, a prohibition that “is fundamental to an adversarial system of justice.” Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162, 171-172 , 95 S.Ct. 896, 903-904 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); accord Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); Dix v. Newsome, 584 F.Supp. 1052 (N.D.Ga.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Bernard Lindhorst, Jr. v. United States
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 , 86 S.Ct. 836 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966); Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 , 95 S.Ct. 896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); Perryman *690 v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 494 S.W.2d 542 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theobald Dworshak
Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 , 95 S.Ct. 896, 904 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); see Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956), vacating per curiam, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 (1955). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harkins v. State
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956), where the cause was remanded to the district court for a hearing on the issue of petitioner’s sanity at the time of his trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Harland Birdwell v. United States
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 ; Smith v. United States, 9 Cir., 267 F.2d 210 ; Fisher v. United States, 4 Cir., 317 F.2d 352 . *879 The order of January 7, 1964 is affirmed insofar as it rescinds and sets aside the order of January 2, 1963.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scherk
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , reversing 96 U.S. App.D.C. 117, 223 F.2d 582 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harold Wayne Davis v. United States
See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 .
cited
Cited "see"
James E. Clatterbuck v. United States
See Bishop v. United States, 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 , reversed on other grounds 1956, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Albert Seidner v. United States
(2×)
See Bishop v. United States, 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 , reversed on other grounds, 1956, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed 835.
cited
Cited "see"
Daher v. United States
See Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 , reversed on other grounds 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Cobb v. Cavell
See Bishop v. United States, 1955, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 117, 223 F.2d 582 , remanded for hearing on the sanity of the petitioner 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Speedy v. Wyrick
Compare Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956) (per curiam), vacating 223 F.2d 582 (D.C.Cir.1955)
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Speedy v. Wyrick
Compare Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956) (per curiam), vacating 223 F.2d 582 (D.C.Cir.1955).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilbur P. Bolius v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida
See also Bishop v. United States, 1956, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul v. State
(2×)
See also Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Van Imschoot
See, e. g., Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , reversing and remanding 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 (1955); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Knohl
See, e. g., Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , vacating and remanding, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 (1955) (mental incompetency); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David L. Hansford v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 223 F.2d 582 (1955), rev'd per curiam, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956); Dusky v. United States, supra note 4; Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hampton v. Tinsley
See also Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S. Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1955).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reginald John Adams v. United States
See, e.g., Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 119 nn. 2, 3, 223 F.2d 582 , 584 nn. 2, 3 (1955), rev’d on other grounds, 350 U.S. 961 , 76 S.Ct. 440 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rogers
v.
Thompson, Trustee
v.
Thompson, Trustee
No. 625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1956.
Mark D. Eagle-ton for petitioner. Thomas T. Railey for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari granted.