New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc. v. Seagram Distillers Corp., 350 U.S. 828 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc. v. Seagram Distillers Corp., 350 U.S. 828 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael K. Topalian, Don W. Boyett, Bobby McDonald Mjm Ventures, Richard H. Manuel, Jack E. Borroughs and Charles W. Anderson v. John N. Ehrman, Rockwood Insurance Company, Michael K. Topalian, Warren B. Fienga, Richard H. Manuel, Don W. Boyett, Bobby W. McDonald Charles F. Lacelle and Mjm Ventures, Plaintiffs-Counter v. John N. Ehrman, Etc., Ehrman Investment Group, Inc., Defendant-Counter and Onshore Exploration Ltd. 1984 Mid-Year Drilling Program, Counter Michael K. Topalian v. John N. Ehrman, Individually, Etc. (ca5, 1992-04-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Michael K. Topalian, Don W. Boyett, Bobby McDonald Mjm Ventures, Richard H. Manuel, Jack E. Borroughs and Charles W. Anderson v. John N. Ehrman, Rockwood Insurance Company, Michael K. Topalian, Warren B. Fienga, Richard H. Manuel, Don W. Boyett, Bobby W. McDonald Charles F. Lacelle and Mjm Ventures, Plaintiffs-Counter v. John N. Ehrman, Etc., Ehrman Investment Group, Inc., Defendant-Counter and Onshore Exploration Ltd. 1984 Mid-Year Drilling Program, Counter Michael K. Topalian v. John N. Ehrman, Individually, Etc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
First, plaintiffs' "list of unfiled fact issues for the proposed pretrial order does not constitute summary judgment evidence, but is merely in the nature of pleadings, which cannot be used to create an issue of fact." Geiserman v. MacDonald, 893 F.2d 787, 793 (5th Cir.1990) (citation omitted); accord Irving Trust Company v. United States, 221 F.2d 303, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Topalian v. Ehrman (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
First, plaintiffs’ “list of unfiled fact issues for the proposed pretrial order does not constitute summary judgment evidence, but is merely in the nature of pleadings, which cannot be used to create an issue of fact.” Geiserman v. MacDonald, 893 F.2d 787, 793 (5th Cir.1990) (citation omitted); accord Irving Trust Company v. United States, 221 F.2d 303, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 (1955).
cited Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen Murphy
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Irving Trust Co. v. United States, 221 F.2d 303, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Elias Ragi Ghaloub, Alias Louis John Ferris, Allias Louis Corey, Alias Nisar John Ferris
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doto v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 17 , 223 F.2d 309, 311 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 754 (1955) (census taken enumerated inhabitants “excluding aliens” for election district purposes, received into evidence to show defendant was an alien).
discussed Cited "see" General Electric Company v. Hess Brothers, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc., 7 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 815 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 ; Sunbeam Corp. v. Marcus, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1952, 105 F.Supp. 39 ; Eastman Kodak Co. v. Home Utilities Co., D.C.Md.1956, 138 F.Supp. 670 ; Donner v. Calvert Distillers Corp., 1950, 196 Md. 475 , 77 A.2d 305 .
cited Cited "see" Voci v. Farkas
E.D. Pa. · 1956 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Chaitt, 1954, 176 Pa.Super. 318 , 107 A.2d 214 , affirmed, 1955, 380 Pa. 532 , 112 A.2d 379 , certiorari denied, 1955, 350 U.S. 829 , 76 S.Ct. 59 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boney v. United States
D.C. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Doto v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 17 , 18, 223 F.2d 309, 310 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 754 (1955); Maragon v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 349 , 350, 187 F.2d 79, 80 (1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 932 , 71 S.Ct. 804 , 95 L.Ed. 1361 (1951). 3 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pasco Marketing, Inc. v. Taylor Towing Service, Inc.
E.D. Mo. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Earhart v. Callan, 9 Cir., 221 F.2d 160 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 829 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 , where the court cited 8 C.J.S.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mid-America Transp. Co. v. St. Louis Barge Fleeting Serv., Inc.
E.D. Mo. · 1964 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Earhart v. Callan, 9 Cir., 221 F.2d 160 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 829 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 , where the court cited 8 C.J.S.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc.
v.
Seagram Distillers Corp.
No. 137.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1955.
350 U.S. 828
William C. Wines for petitioners. Frank D. Mayer, Louis A. Kohn and Robert L. Stern for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.