green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…those who acquired seniority rights under a contract are bound by the possibility that the contract may be changed, and the rights thereunder revised or abrogated
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company
those who acquired seniority rights under a contract are bound by the possibility that the contract may be changed, and the rights thereunder revised or abrogated
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
those who acquired seniority rights under a contract are bound by the possibility that the contract may be changed, and the rights thereunder revised or abrogated
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmine G. Desapio
See Armstrong v. United States, 228 F.2d 764, 768 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 918 , 76 S.Ct. 710 , 100 L.Ed. 1450 (1956); Johnson v. United States, 291 F.2d 150, 156 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 880 , 82 S.Ct. 130 , 7 L.Ed.2d 80 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Lehigh and New England Railway Company
See McMullans v. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry., 229 F.2d 50 (C.A.10, 1956), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 918 , 76 S.Ct. 710 , 100 L.Ed. 1450 ; Goodin v. Clinchfield R.
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Railway Co.
See McMullans v. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry., 229 F.2d 50 (C.A.10, 1956), cert, denied, 351 U.S. 918 , 76 S.Ct. 710 , 100 L.Ed. 1450 ; Goodin v. Clinchfield R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMullans
v.
Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc.
v.
Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc.
No. 759.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1956.
C. A. Summers for petitioners. R. M. Mountcastle for the Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc., and Harold R. Shoemake and Harold C. Heiss for Local No. 488, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, et al., respondents.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.