News Printing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 352 U.S. 845 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
News Printing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 352 U.S. 845 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Shoe Corp. v. United States (cit, 1995-10-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States Shoe Corp. v. United States (2×)
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dart Export Corp. v. United States, 43 CCPA 64, 74, C.A.D. 610, 1956 WL 8339 (holding Customs' acceptance of estimated duties tendered did not constitute decision), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956); Best Foods, Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust.Ct. 1 , 9-10, 147 F.Supp. 749, 756-57 (1956) (holding payment of customs duties at time of entry not decision for purpose of computing time to file protest).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Blocker
cma · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919, 924 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956).
discussed Cited "see" TETERS FLORAL PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 318 , 53 S.Ct. 350, 359 , 77 L.Ed. 796 (1933) and Dart Export Corp. v. United States, 43 C.C.P.A. 64, 74-76 (1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 48 (1956).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Leovigildo Bazan
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919, 925-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Selim J. Blazewicz
6th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir. 1956), cert. den., 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1957).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Nitin Shah
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.) (upholding the conviction of an accomplice who caused to be made such statements of purpose where applicant had no real intent to occupy the premises), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956); Russell v. United States, 222 F.2d 197 (5th Cir.1955) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent (2×)
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Carrillo, supra. Similarly, we have held that in federal court, "the failure of a party to produce as a witness one peculiarly within the power of such party creates an inference that such testimony would be unfavorable, and may be the subject of comment to the jury by the other party." United States v. Lehmann, 613 F.2d 130, 136 (5th Cir.1980) (quoting McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 47 (1956)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State ex rel. Collet v. Scopel
Mo. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Taylor v. State, Old., 291 P.2d 1033, 1041 , appeal dismissed 352 U.S. 805 , 77 S.Ct. 33 , 1 L.Ed.2d 38 ; Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine of State v. Tubbs, Okl., 307 P.2d 830, 832 ; Weber v. Florida State Board of Optometry, Fla., 73 So.2d 408 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NITIN SHAH
unknown court · signal: see also · confidence low
See also McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.) (upholding the conviction of an accomplice who caused to be made such statements of purpose where applicant had no real intent to occupy the premises), cert. denied, 77 S.Ct. 33 (1956); Russell v. United States, 222 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1955) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
News Printing Co., Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 91.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
352 U.S. 845
Charles A. Horsky and Jerome Ackerman for petitioner. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling and Dominick L. Manoli for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.