green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury 89-2
See United States v. United States District Court, 238 F.2d 713 (4th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 981 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957) (refusal to allow subpoenas and refusal to permit government counsel to have a transcript of the testimony or to digest it for the grand jury constituted an unwarranted interference with the proper functioning of the grand jury). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal Revenue
See United States v. United States District Court, 238 F.2d 713 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 981 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957). 40 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zirpolo
See United States v. United States District Court, 238 F.2d 713, 720 (4 Cir. 1956) cert. den. 352 U.S. 981 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. United States District Court For The Southern District Of West Virginia
See 77 S.Ct. 382 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turner v. Inland Tugs Co.
F.R.Ev. 103(a)(1); see also Olender v. United States, 237 F.2d 859, 866 (9th Cir.1956) (hearsay objection not raised at trial cannot be urged on appeal as reversible error), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 982 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957); cf. Cunningham v. Healthco, Inc., 824 F.2d 1448, 1458 (5th Cir.1987) (“defenses not raised or argued at trial are ordinarily waived by the parties failing to raise them”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Meyers
See, e. g., United States v. United States District Court, 238 F.2d 713 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied sub nom., Valley Bell Dairy Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 981 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957); United States v. Rintelen, 235 F. 787 (D.C.N.Y.1916); Turpin v. State, 206 Ind. 345 , 189 N.E. 403 (1934).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to First National Bank of Maryland Dated November 4, 1976
See, e. g., United States v. United States District Court, 238 F.2d 713 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 981 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 ; In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 342 F.Supp. 709 (D.Md.1972); In re Linen Supply Co., 15 F.R.D. 115, 118-19 (S.D.N.Y.1953); Application of Radio Corporation of America (R.C.A.), 13 F.R.D. 167, 172 (S.D.N.Y.1952); Petition of Borden, 75 F.Supp. 857 (N.D.Ill.1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stein Hall & Co., Inc., and Swift & Company v. S.S. Concordia Viking, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Skibs A/s Samuel Bakke, and Third-Party v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp., Third-Party
See also Olender v. United States, 237 F.2d 859, 866 (9 Cir. 1956), cert. den., 352 U.S. 982 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957) 4 Damage reports made by stevedores 'acting as an agent or contractor' of the ship have been held admissible as business records when introduced by the ship against the shipper.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stein Hale & Co. v. S.S. Concordia Viking
See also Olender v. United States, 237 F.2d 859, 866 (9 Cir. 1956), cert, den., 352 U.S. 982 , 77 S.Ct. 382 , 1 L.Ed.2d 365 (1957). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Olender
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1957.
Leo R. Friedman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney General Rice for the United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.