United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 352 U.S. 997 (1957).

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 352 U.S. 997 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.4 score

8 citation events across 7 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 8

Treatment by court

ca6	0R/0Y/0G	2
ca3	0R/0Y/0G	1
ca8	0R/0Y/0G	1
cadc	0R/0Y/0G	1
nm	0R/0Y/0G	1
nysd	0R/0Y/0G	1
paed	0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

United States
v.
Procter & Gamble Co.

No. 609.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb 25, 1957.

352 U.S. 997

77 S. Ct. 556

1957 U.S. LEXIS 1264

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States. Kenneth C. Royall, Charles Sawyer, Frederick W. R. Pride and Richard W. Barrett for the Procter & Gamble Co., Mathias F. Correa and Jerrold G. Van Cise for the Colgate-Palmolive Co., Abe Fortas for Lever Brothers Co., and Adrien F. Busick and Shelby Fitze for the Association of American Soap & Glycerine Producers, Inc., appellees.

Published

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed'to the hearing of the case on the merits.