green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Transpacific Carriers Corp. v. The Tug Ellen F. McAllister
See Pannell v. Unit ed States Lines Co., 263 F.2d 497 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Transpacific Carriers Corporation v. The Tug Ellen F. Mcallister
See Pannell v. United States Lines Co., 263 F.2d 497 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seguros Comercial Americas S.A. De C v. v. American President Lines, Ltd.
See, e.g., Pannell v. U.S. Lines Co., 263 F.2d 497, 498 (2d Cir.) (definition of the term “package” that appeared in the bill of lading controlled over an inconsistent definition in COGSA), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959); PPG Indus., Inc. v. Ashland Oil Co. —Thomas Petroleum Transit Div., 527 F.2d 502 , 507 (3d Cir.1975) (parties could have extended, but neglected to do so, COG-SA’s statute of limitations provision to agent of carrier); Commonwealth Petrochemicals, Inc. v. S/S Puerto Rico, 607 F.2d 322, 328 (4th Cir.1979) (specific definition of “…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
See also Pannell v. U.S. Lines, 263 F.2d 497, 498 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959) ("if [COGSA] applied ex proprio vigore the yacht, like the tractor in the Gulf Italia case, could not be deemed a ‘package,’ and the parties by so describing it could not reduce the carrier’s liability.’’). 4 .Ocean bills of lading are considered contracts of adhesion.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Croft & Scully Co. v. M/V SKULPTOR VUCHETICH
See, e. g., Pannell v. United States Lines Company, 263 F.2d 497 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. M v. Vishva Shobha
See, e. g., Pannell v. United States Lines Co., 263 F.2d 497, 498 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1013 , 79 S.Ct. 1151 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1959); Waterman S.S.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Biscuit Division (Biscuit Council, Bakery and Confectionery Workers' International Union of America)
v.
Leedom, Constituting the National Labor Relations Board
v.
Leedom, Constituting the National Labor Relations Board
No. 869.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1959.
Abraham J. Harris and James H. Heller for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.