Baker v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co., 358 U.S. 878 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Baker v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co., 358 U.S. 878 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 1 distinct case · "a showing of prejudice is not required when a criminal defendant is asserting a constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment"
184 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 46 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States of America Ex Rel. Kahmid Solomon, Relator-Appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison (ca2, 1969-05-05) · Strongest negative: United States v. Seafarers International Union of North America (nyed, 1972-05-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Seafarers International Union of North America (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D.N.Y · 1972 · signal: but see · confidence high
See United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966); but see United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958) (leaving open the possibility that passage of time can be a per se *788 violation of the due process clause).
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States of America Ex Rel. Kahmid Solomon, Relator-Appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison (2×)
2d Cir. · 1969 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
a showing of prejudice is not required when a criminal defendant is asserting a constitutional right under the sixth amendment
discussed Cited "see" Bienvenido Diaz v. Schwerman Trucking Company
11th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holcomb v. Aetna Insurance Co., 255 F.2d 577, 580 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 879 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 110 (1958) (at the pretrial conference, “the court has the power to compel the parties to agree to all facts concerning which there can be no real issue.”) (citations omitted); Berger v. Brannan, 172 F.2d 241, 243 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 941 , 69 S.Ct. 1519 , 93 L.Ed. 1746 (1949) (“The spirit of a pre-trial procedure is not only to call the parties together and ask them to stipulate as to all matters concerning which there can be no dispute, but to compel t…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Endres
Mo. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
Pitts v. North Carolina, 395 F.2d 182, 184-185 (4th Cir. 1968); Smith v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 289 , 418 F.2d 1120 (1969); see United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 477-478 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Potash
S.D.N.Y. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 285 F.2d 475 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958). 19 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Campopiano
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (C.A. 2), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Sanchez, 361 F.2d 824 (C.A. 2, 1966).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Baron
S.D.N.Y. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Perez, 310 F.Supp. 550 (S.D.N.Y.1970); United States v. Skinner, 308 F.Supp. 1221 (S.D.N.Y.1969); United States v. Chin, 306 F.Supp. 397 (S.D.N.Y.1969); United States v. Mann, 291 F.Supp. 268 (S.D.N.Y.1968); United States v. Richardson, 291 F.Supp. 441 (S.D.N.Y.1968); United States v. Roberts, 293 F.Supp. 195 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stanley Garelle and Martin Zimmerman (2×)
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 478 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ralph F. Deleo
1st Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
Pitts v. North Carolina, 395 F.2d 182, 184-185 (4th Cir. 1968); Smith v. United States, 418 F.2d 1120 (D.C.Cir. 1969); see United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 477-478 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 109 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Cacciatore v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2 Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958).
cited Cited "see" George Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Johnny B. Rozier, Jr. v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 475, 478 , cert, denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Dooling
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 478 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Kaufman, 311 F.2d 695, 698 (2d Cir. 1963).
cited Cited "see" ca2 1969
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 478 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Kaufman, 311 F.2d 695, 698 (2d Cir. 1963).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mann
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 478 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Algranati, 239 F.Supp. 116, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1965).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arthur Della Rocca
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475, 478 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958); United States v. Maxwell, 383 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1967) and cases cited therein at p. 441, footnote 2.
cited Cited "see" United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
W.D. Mo. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Joines v. United States, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 .
cited Cited "see" United States ex rel. Pizarro v. Fay
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 475, 478 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 ; and see United States v. Kelly, 2 Cir., 1965, 349 F.2d 720, 768 .
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Manuel M. Pizarro v. Edward M. Fay
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 475, 478 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 ; and see United States v. Kelly, 2 Cir., 1965, 349 F.2d 720, 768 .
cited Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Louis Von Cseh v. Edward M. Fay, Warden of Greenhaven State Prison, Stormville, New York
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2 Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Erie County Malt Beverage Distributors Association
3rd Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Melrose Distilleries, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 726, 729 , certiorari granted on another issue, 1958, 358 U.S. 878 , 79 S.Ct. 125 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Erie County Malt Beverage Distributors Ass'n
3rd Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Melrose Distilleries, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 726, 729 , certiorari granted on another issue, 1958, 358 U.S. 878 , 79 S.Ct. 125 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Colitto
E.D.N.Y · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958) (four years not excessive where defendant was found to have waived his right); United States v. Della Rocca, 388 F.2d 525 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 390 U.S. 745 , 88 S.Ct. 1443 , 20 L.Ed.2d 274 (1968) (over 7 year delay between arrest and trial not excessive where defendant failed to assert his right for almost five years after indictment).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. Barber v. Hendrick
E.D. Pa. · 1970 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir. 1964) where a delay of nine months was found insufficient to constitute a prima facie case of prejudice, with United States v. Lustman, 258 F.2d 475 (2nd Cir.), cert, denied, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 (1958) where a four year delay was held to constitute such a prima facie case.
Baker
v.
Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
No. 363.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1958.
358 U.S. 878
Harvey L. Davis for petitioners. D. L. Case for respondent.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fifth Supreme Judicial District. Certiorari granted.