James v. Todd, 358 U.S. 206 (1958). · Go Syfert
James v. Todd, 358 U.S. 206 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases · "misconduct"
53 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richardson v. Florida State Board of Dentistry (fladistctapp, 1976-02-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Richardson v. Florida State Board of Dentistry
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
misconduct
discussed Cited "see" Monihan v. Monihan (2×)
Pa. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See James v. Grand Trunk Railroad Co., 14 Ill. 2d 356 , 152 N.E. 2d 858 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 915 , 79 S. Ct. 288 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Greene v. Real Estate Commission
D.C. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ladrey v. Commission on Licensure to Practice, Etc., 104 U.S.App.D.C. 239 , 261 F.2d 68 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 920 , 79 S.Ct. 288 , 3 L.Ed.2d 239 . 6 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stambaugh v. Stambaugh (2×)
Pa. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also James v. Grand Trunk Western R.R., 14 Ill.2d 356 , 152 N.E.2d 858 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 915 , 79 S. Ct. 288 (1958); Hammer v. Hammer, 303 N.Y. 481 , 104 N.E.2d 864 (1952); Garvin v. Garvin, 302 N.Y. 96 , 96 N.E.2d 721 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JAMES ET AL.
v.
TODD, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRIES OF ALABAMA.
464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1958.
358 U.S. 206
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, W. E. McIntyre, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, Frank M. Dixon and Sol E. Brinsfield for appellants.

John Patterson, Attorney General of Alabama, and Gordon Madison and George O. Miller, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.