Franko v. Mahoning Cnty. Bar Ass'n, 358 U.S. 932 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Franko v. Mahoning Cnty. Bar Ass'n, 358 U.S. 932 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: American Stores v. Town of Kearny (njsuperctappdiv, 1994-04-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" American Stores v. Town of Kearny
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Jersey Turnpike Auth. v. Bowley, 27 N.J. 549, 556 , 143 A.2d 558 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 927 , 79 S.Ct. 312 , 3 L.Ed.2d 301 (1959).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leonid Tankel
2d Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kyle, 2 Cir., 257 F.2d 559, 564 , cert. den. 358 U.S. 927 , 79 S.Ct. 312 , 3 L.Ed.2d 301 , where we said that “The conscious knowing intent to defraud” is one of “the two essential elements of the mail fraud statute.”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Franko
v.
Mahoning County Bar Association
No. 475.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1959.
358 U.S. 932
Eugene Gressman for petitioner. John H. Ranz for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.