Braeburn Sec. Corp. v. Smith, 359 U.S. 311 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Braeburn Sec. Corp. v. Smith, 359 U.S. 311 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Orona v. State (texapp, 2011-07-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Orona v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Washburn v. State, 167 Tex. Crim. 125 , 318 S.W.2d 627 (1958), cen. denied, 359 U.S. 965 , 79 S.Ct. 876 , 3 L.Ed.2d 834 (1959). .
cited Cited "see" Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See 79 S.Ct. 876 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." District of Columbia v. Southern Railway Company
D.C. Cir. · 1960 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp. v. District of Columbia, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 261 F.2d 758 , certiorari denied 1959, 359 U.S. 968 , 79 S.Ct. 876 , 3 L.Ed.2d 834 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mississippi State Tax Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
Miss. · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Duluth South Shore and Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Michigan Corporation and Securities Commission, 353 Mich. 636 , 92 N. W. 2d 22 (1958), motion to dismiss appeal sustained in ibid., 359 U. S. 310 , 79 S. Ct. 876 , 3 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BRAEBURN SECURITIES CORP.
v.
SMITH, AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
718.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1959.
359 U.S. 311
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

John A. Bussian, William M. Doty and Gerald M. Chapman for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, and Benjamin S. Adamowski for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.