green
Positive treatment
0.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Shell Oil Co. v. City and County of San Francisco
(See, e.g., Pacific Coast etc. Bank v. Roberts, supra, 16 Cal.2d 800 [mortgagee an owner within the meaning of redemption statutes except for purpose of emergency legislation extending time for redemption]; Gray v. Board of Supervisors (1957) 154 Cal.App.2d 700 [ 316 P.2d 678 ] [nonowner church eligible to apply for a use permit]; but cf. Minney v. City of Azusa (1958) 164 Cal.App.2d 12 [ 330 P.2d 255 ], app. dism., 359 U.S. 436 [ 3 L.Ed.2d 932 , 79 S.Ct. 941 ] [purchase-option holder ineligible to apply for a zoning variance as an owner]; Harbor Supply Co. v. Motor Boat Astorian (1931) 116 Ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cameron
See, also, Minney v. City of Azusa, 164 Cal. App. 2d 12 , 330 P. 2d 255 (D.Ct.App. 1958), app. dism. for *74 want of a properly presented federal question, 359 U.S. 436 , 79 S.Ct. 941 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 932 (1959); Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Mullen, 214 Or. 281 , 330 P. 2d 5 (Sup.Ct. 1958), app. dism. and cert. den. 359 U.S. 436 , 79 S.Ct. 940 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 932 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
No. 776.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1959.
Mozart G. Ratner and Morris J. Levin for appellants.
Published
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.