green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
If the railroad’s noncompliance with the 30-day waiting period of Section 5, First, of the Railway Labor Act had been a bar to injunctive relief, this Court would have had no occasion to reach the question upon which it rested its decision.” Memorandum of National Mediation Board filed in Supreme Court No. 100 October Term, 1959, pp. 4-9, 80 S.Ct. 56 .
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Frigidaire Local 801 v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division
See NLRB v. International Woodworkers, 264 F.2d 649, 657 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 816 , 80 S.Ct. 56 , 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Frigidaire Local 801 v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. International Woodworkers, 264 F.2d 649, 657 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 816 , 80 S.Ct. 56 , 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson v. Royal Rotterdam Lloyd
See also Calmar S. S. Corp. v. Nacirema Operating Co., 266 F.2d 79 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 816 , 80 S.Ct. 56 , 4 L.Ed.2d 62 (1959) (ship allowed recovery although it supplied a defective light which was then negligently handled by stevedore).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Blackstone Memorial Library Association
v.
Gulp, Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co.
v.
Gulp, Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co.
No. 102.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1959.
Watson Washburn for petitioners. Kenneth F. Burgess, D. Robert Thomas, Walter J. Cummings, Jr. and Arthur R.. Seder, Jr. for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari. denied.