green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Whatever merits this solution may have, a court injunction would not be an act of neutrality.”
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, and Its District Lodge 100 v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
whatever merits this solution may have, a court injunction would not be an act of neutrality.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flight Engineers' International Ass'n v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
See Division No. 14, Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Leighty, 298 F.2d 17 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962).” This applies with even greater force here, since the Mediation Board has already made an “ultimate determination” by certifying ALPA as the bargaining agent for Eastern’s flight engineers.
cited
Cited "see"
Ruby v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Division No. 14, Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Leighty, 298 F.2d 17 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Ruby v. American Airlines
See division No. 14, Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Leighty, 298 F.2d 17 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives Association v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company
See also Telegraphers v. Leighty, 298 F.2d 17 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962) (district courts lack jurisdiction to resolve representation dispute) 4 The NS/W & LE transfer took place on May 17.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives Ass'n v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co.
See also Telegraphers v. Leighty, 298 F.2d 17 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962) (district courts lack jurisdiction to resolve representation dispute). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. United States
See also, United States v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co., 297 F.2d 891 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 887 , 82 S.Ct. 1160 , 8 L.Ed.2d 287 (1962); Estate of May v. Comm’r, 283 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 903 , 81 S.Ct. 1045 , 6 L.Ed.2d 202 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.
v.
Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.
No. 843.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1962.
Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.