green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Gerova Financial Group, Ltd.
See In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 291 F.2d 22, 28 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 925 , 82 S.Ct. 360 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961) (reviewing the legislative history of the three-creditor requirement); see also In re Caucus Distrib., Inc., 106 B.R. 890, 897-98 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Arbitration Between Judy Lee, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. James John Chica Engler-Budd & Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-Appellants
(2×)
Communications Workers, 648 F.2d at 457 ; Minute Maid Co. v. Citrus, Cannery, Food Processing, etc., 331 F.2d 280, 281 (5th Cir.1964); accord Int’l Assn. of Machinists v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc., 292 F.2d 112, 119 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 926 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Eisenberg
(4×)
See In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 385 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961), where the court interpreted the word " ‘it’ in the statute as referring to the application as a whole, and [held] that counsel's good faith must be stated.” Id. 33 .Specifically, an affidavit of Sachs states: "The motion of defendant Bertoli for an Order of Recusal under 18 [28] U.S.C. [§] 455(a) is made in good faith." 2 November 1989 Sachs Aff. at ¶ 5. 34 .
examined
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.
(3×)
See In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 391 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated
(3×)
See In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 391 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Jonathan Cooper and Steven Lynn
(3×)
See In re Union Leader Corporation, 292 F.2d 381, 390-391 (1st Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961) (whether or not trial court was correct in its conclusion that a party had engaged in misconduct, the court’s view was not unwarranted and did not indicate personal bias or prejudice); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794 , 799-800 (2d Cir.1966) (Second Circuit found that $50 contempt fine and threat of confinement imposed on counsel — but later retracted — were unwarranted and that judge’s apparent attempt to discredit lawyer’s testimony was “carele…
discussed
Cited "see"
Willoughby Roofing & Supply Co. v. Kajima International, Inc.
(2×)
Accord, Lodge No. 12, District No. 37, International Association of Machinists v. Cameron Iron Works, 292 F.2d 112, 119 (5th Cir.1961), cert. denied 368 U.S. 926 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961) (arbitrator’s remedy to be upheld in the absence of “clearly restrictive language” in the arbitration agreement); Minute Maid Co. v. Citrus, Cannery, Food Processing and Allied Workers, etc., 331 F.2d 280, 281 (5th Cir.1964) (arbitrator’s remedy upheld where the “contract did not exclude from arbitration either the subject matter or the remedy adopted by the arbiter”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sverdrup/Aro, Inc. v. Intern. Ass'n of MacHinists
(2×)
See Minute Maid Company v. Citrus, Food Proc. & Allied Wkrs., Etc., C.A. 5th (1964), 331 F.2d 280 , 281 and Lodge No. 12, Etc. v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc., C.A. 5th (1961), 292 F.2d 112, 119 [14], certiorari denied (1961), 368 U.S. 926 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 .
examined
Cited "see"
Matter of Evans
(3×)
See In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 388 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.
(3×)
Moreover, under pre-1974 section 455 “a federal judge has a duty to sit where not disqualified which is equally as strong as *1389 the duty to not sit where disqualified.” Laird v. Tatum, 409 U.S. 824, 837 , 93 S.Ct. 7,15 , 34 L.Ed.2d 50 (1972) (Memorandum of Rehnquist, J., denying motion for his disqualification) (emphasis omitted); see In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 391 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
May Department Stores Co. v. Teamsters Union Local No. 743
See People v. Goduto (1961), 21 Ill. 2d 605 , cert. denied, 369 U.S. 927 , 7 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Puget Sound Traffic Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 294 F.2d 235 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 363 , 7 L.Ed.2d 191 (1961).
examined
Cited "see"
John N. Mitchell v. Honorable John J. Sirica, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
(6×)
See In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 384 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Federal Maritime Commission
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. FPC, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 16 , 294 F.2d 212 (1961); see Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 39, 41-42 , 294 F.2d 235 , 237-238, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 363 , 7 L.Ed.2d 191 (1961). .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Commonwealth Of Puerto Rico v. Federal Maritime Commission
This is a different question from the reviewability of a lack of suspension, cf. Municipal Light Boards v. FPC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 450 F.2d 1341 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972) 20 Compare FMC v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien, 390 U.S. 238 , 88 S.Ct. 1005 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1968); Latin America/Pacific Coast Steamship Conference v. FMC, 150 U.S.App.D.C. ___ , 465 F.2d 542, at p. 553 (1972), indicating that when a party shows the existence of a nonfrivolous antitrust question the agency rightly shifts the burden of proof to those seeking antit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc.
See People v. Goduto, 21 Ill. 2d 605, 608-609 , 174 N. E. 2d 385, 387 , cert. denied, 368 U. S. 927 (1961); Hood v. Stafford, 213 Tenn. 684, 694-695 , 378 S. W. 2d 766, 771 (1964); Moreland Corp. v. Retail Store Employees, Local 444, 16 Wis. 2d 499, 503 , 114 N. W. 2d 876, 878 (1962); Broomfield, Preemptive Federal Jurisdiction Over Concerted Trespassory Union Activity, 83 Harv.
examined
Cited "see"
Smith v. Insurance Company of North America
(3×)
See In the Matter of Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 385 (1st Cir., 1961) cert. denied 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John R. Loveless, Claude W. Bowman & John P. Hall v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Charles G. Dyer, S. T. Belastock and George Smith
(2×)
See also Lodge No. 12, I.A.M. v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc., 292 F.2d 112, 118 (5th Cir.) (“no modification clause” does not prevent an arbitrator from finding rights implied though not expressed in the collective bargaining agreement), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 926 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Fleet Cowden
(3×)
See also In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 388-92 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
(5×)
See also In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 384 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927, 82 S.Ct. 861, 7 L.Ed. 2d 190 ; Knapp v. Kinsey, 232 F.2d 458 (6th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 892 , 77 S.Ct. 131 , 1 L.Ed.2d 86 . .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
(6×)
See also In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 384 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 190 ; Knapp v. Kinsey, 232 F.2d 458 (6th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 892 , 77 S.Ct. 131 , 1 L.Ed.2d 86 . [58] In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 , 75 S.Ct. 623 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955). [59] Whitaker v. McLean, 73 App.D.C. 259 , 118 F.2d 596 (1941) (per curiam). [60] In re J.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Julian C. Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority and Civil Service Commission of the City of New York
(3×)
See also, In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 390 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961); In re United Shoe Machinery Corp., 276 F.2d 77, 79 (1st Cir. 1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Union Leader Corp.
No. 435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1961.
James M. Malloy and Ralph Warren Sullivan for petitioner. Frank Goldman for the Haver-hill Gazette Co., respondent and intervenor.
Cited by 138 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.