green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Smith
But see Sears v. Austin, 292 F.2d 690 (9th Cir.) (before Congress amended Act to require witnesses for designation or changes in beneficiary, court allowed manifested intent of insured expressed in holographic will to prevail), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 929 , 82 S.Ct. 365 , 7 L.Ed.2d 192 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Hightower v. Kirksey
See Sears v. Austin, 292 F.2d 690, 692, n. 2 (9th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 929 , 82 S.Ct. 365 , 7 L.Ed.2d 192 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Charlene C. Hightower, Plaintiff--Counter-Defendant--Appellee v. Lessie Kirksey, Defendant--Counter-Defendant--Appellant v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, Defendant--Counter-Claimant--Appellee
See Sears v. Austin, 292 F.2d 690, 692, n. 2 (9th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 929 , 82 S.Ct. 365 , 7 L.Ed.2d 192 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dickerson
See State v. Johnson, 34 N.J. 212, 223 , 168 A. 2d 1 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 933 , 82 S.Ct. 370 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 195 (1961); State v. Engel, 249 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Proctor Ex Rel. Proctor v. Insurance Co. of North America
See Sears v. Austin, 292 F.2d 690 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 929 , 82 S.Ct. 365 , 7 L.Ed.2d 192 (1961), overruled by statute 5 U.S.C.A. § 8705 (a) (West Supp.1985); Jones v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, La.App., 173 So.2d 373 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Sullivan
See, e.g., Sears v. Austin, 292 F.2d 690 (9th Cir.1961) cert. denied, 368 U.S. 929 , 82 S.Ct. 365 , 7 L.Ed.2d 192 (1961) (enforcing a designation of beneficiary made in a valid will rather than by compliance with requirements of the FEGLIA); United States v. Pahmer, 238 F.2d 431 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1026 , 77 S.Ct. 592 , 1 L.Ed.2d 597 (1957) (enforcing a change of beneficiary by a will not yet admitted to probate in a similar case under the regulations of the Veterans’ Administration).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Seidenbach's
v.
Bland Terry Shoe Corp.
v.
Bland Terry Shoe Corp.
No. 462.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1961.
Morrison Shafroth, John F. Shafroth, Robert J. Woolsey and Frank Settle for petitioner.
Published
Motion to supplement the petition granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.