Porges v. Schiele, 368 U.S. 838 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Porges v. Schiele, 368 U.S. 838 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
138 citation events across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leonhard v. United States (ca2, 1980-08-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Leonhard v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert.denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Leonhard v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor, Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961). .
cited Cited "see" David Weinberger, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Retail Credit Company
4th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 87-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Company, 288 F.2d 80, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" William Ortiz v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Agents of the State of New York
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961). *915 in.
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. Lindsley
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 ; Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 ; Tobacco & Allied Stocks v. Transamerica Corp., supra 143 F.Supp. at 328 and 329.
discussed Cited "see" Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
DeLuca v. Atlantic Refining Co., 176 F.2d 421, 424 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 943 , 70 S.Ct. 423 , 94 L.Ed. 581 (1950); see, Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. Lindsley
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp., 143 F.Supp. 323, 328-329 (D.Del.1956), aff’d 244 F.2d 902 (3d Cir. 1957); 3 Loss, Securities Regulation p. 1776.
discussed Cited "see" Ohio Valley Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 87 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961): Even if no affimative act of concealment is required in restraint of trade conspiracy cases, see Dawson [Fraudulent Concealment and Statutes of Limitation, 31 Mich.L.Rev. 875 (1933)] at 880, 907-08; American Tobacco Co. v. People’s Tobacco Co. [ 204 Fed. 58 (5th Cir. 1913)]; cf. 63 Harv.L.Rev. at 1221, in contrast to the usual rule when there is no fiduciary relationship, a point we do not decide * * *.
cited Cited "see" Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. Kiely
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Movie-color, Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 86-88 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Cinnamon v. Abner A. Wolf, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Judge Friendly’s excellent discussion of this point in Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co. (C.A.2, 1961), 288 F.2d 80 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 .
cited Cited "see" Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 88 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 26 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carbone v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Moviecolor Limited v Eastman Kodak Co. 288 F2d 80, 83 (CA2), cert. denied, 368 US 821 , 7 L Ed 2d 26 , 82 S Ct 39 (1961); Fulton v. Loew’s Inc. 114 F Supp 676, 678-682 (Kans 1953); Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 113 F Supp 937, 941-942 , (WD Mo 1953); Wolf Sales Co. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. 105 F Supp 506, 509 (Colo 1952).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sentry Corporation and Sne Corporation v. Ethel R. Harris, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 1, 1973
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Moviecolor, Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 83-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); see also Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 33 & n. 100 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); cf. Burnett v. New York Central R.R., 380 U.S. 424, 435 , 85 S.Ct. 1050, 1058 , 13 L.Ed.2d 941 (1965) (adopting uniform tolling rule in FELA action).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Porges
v.
Schiele, Tax Commissioner
No. 134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 838
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted.