green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
1.8 score
“each of the . episodes gained color from each of the others”
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Joseph Dipalermo, A/K/A \Joe Beck\"
each of the . episodes gained color from each of the others
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Beigel
See United States v. Monica, 295 F.2d 400, 401 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 953 , 82 S.Ct. 395 , 7 L.Ed.2d 386 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Think Achievement Corp.
Among the business practices determined to be fraudulent or deceptive are the following: using labels or trade names in a manner having a capacity or tendency to mislead the purchaser, Niresk Indus., Inc. v. FTC, 278 F.2d 337, 340 (7th Cir. 1960); Lighthouse Rug Co. v. FTC, 35 F.2d 163, 165-66 (7th Cir.1929); see also U.S. Navy Weekly, Inc. v. FTC, 207 F.2d 17 (D.C.Cir.1953) (use of the name U.S. Navy Weekly, a privately owned, unofficial publication, not associated with the United States Navy, was misleading and deceptive and adding qualifying or explanatory language would not eliminate the d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, II
See, e. g., United States v. Monica, 295 F.2d 400, 401 (2 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 953 , 82 S.Ct. 395 , 7 L.Ed.2d 386 (1962); United States v. Coblentz, 453 F.2d 503 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 917 , 92 S.Ct. 1766 , 32 L.Ed.2d 116 (1972); United States v. Iannelli, 461 F.2d 483 , 486 n. 4 (2 Cir. 1972); United States v. Massarotti, 462 F.2d 1328 ,-(2 Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melillo
Compare United States v. Monica, 295 F.2d 400 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 953 , 82 S.Ct. 395 , 7 L.Ed.2d 386 (1962) (“[wjhether the test of sufficiency of the evidence for the jury in a criminal prosecution be properly phrased as simply that ‘the evidence would have been enough in a civil action’, or * * * must be ‘sub *318 stantial enough to establish a case from which the jury may infer guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’, * * * the evidence here met it.”); United States v. Lefkowitz, 284 F.2d 310, 315 (2d Cir. 1960) (“the question is whether, taking all the evidence, t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shaffer, Indenture Trustees
v.
Anderson, Trustee in Reorganization
v.
Anderson, Trustee in Reorganization
No. 544.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1962.
M. James Spitzer for petitioners. Harry N. Boureau for respondent. Solicitor General Cox, Peter A. Dammann and David Ferber for the Securities and Exchange Commission. Malcolm S. Mason and Irwin L. Langbein for the Protective Committee.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Motion to correct and amend title to show the Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc., as a party respondent granted. Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.