Cafferata v. Ohio, 368 U.S. 834 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Cafferata v. Ohio, 368 U.S. 834 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1988 · 2 courts · …there is no doubt in our minds that this arrangement to expedite this litigation to final conclusion was well within the authority of the lawyers who participated. ⚠ not in text
41 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The Sioux Tribe of Indians, Oglala Sioux Tribe and Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. The United States (cafc, 1988-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) The Sioux Tribe of Indians, Oglala Sioux Tribe and Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. The United States (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1988 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
there is no doubt in our minds that this arrangement to expedite this litigation to final conclusion was well within the authority of the lawyers who participated.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1987 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
there is no doubt in our minds that this arrangement to expedite this litigation to final conclusion was well within the authority of the lawyers who participated.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cafferata
v.
Ohio
No. 274.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 834
Petitioner pro se. C. Watson Hover for respondent.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2) · Court of Claims (1)

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.