Henry v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 371 U.S. 821 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Henry v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 371 U.S. 821 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Banzhaf v. Federal Communications Commission (cadc, 1968-11-21) · Strongest negative: Comtronics, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company (ca1, 1977-05-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Comtronics, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company (2×)
1st Cir. · 1977 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Co., 300 F.2d 816, 820 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 820 , 83 S.Ct. 37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 61 (1962). 11 We also conclude that no judicially created damages remedy is available to Comtronics to compensate for the harm caused by PRTC's alleged violation of the Communications Act.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Banzhaf v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 247 , 302 F.2d 191 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821 , 83 S.Ct. 37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962); Allen B.
cited Cited "see, e.g." John F. Banzhaf, III v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., the Tobacco Institute, Inc., the American Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Larus & Brother Co., Inc., Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., Philip Morris, Inc., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., United States Tobacco Co., P. Lorillard Co., Intervenors. Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Heart Disease Research Foundation, Intervenors. The Tobacco Institute, Incorporated v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S. App.D.C. 247, 302 F.2d 191 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821 , 83 S.Ct. 37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962); Allen B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry, doing business as Suburban Broadcasters
v.
Federal Communications Commission
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 821
Lester W. Spillane, Robert L. Heald and Edward F. Kenehan for petitioners., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Max D. Paglin, Daniel R. Ohlbaum and Ernest 0. Eisenberg for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.