green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet Trust
See also Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 413 Pa. 1, 5 , 194 A.2d 319, 321 (1963), Cert. denied, 377 U.S. 924 , 84 S.Ct. 1221 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964). 24 The deposition of Helen Blumberg reveals that she and her attorney discussed the filing of a claim corresponding to the assertions made in count one at about the time Sonnenblick-Goldman confessed judgment on its note.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet Trust
See also Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 413 Pa. 1, 5 , 194 A.2d 319, 321 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 924 , 84 S.Ct. 1221 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hollywood Brands, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1964.
Fred S. Ball, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.