green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
See Panhandle Eastern Pipe *20 Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 8, 11 , 316 F.2d 659, 662 (D.C.Cir.1963), cer t. denied 375 U.S. 881 , 84 S.Ct. 147 , 11 L.Ed.2d 111 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N. Bebchick and Daniel W. Gottlieb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
See also Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FPC, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 8, 11-12 , 316 F.2d 659, 662-663 (en banc), cert. denied 375 U.S. 881 , 84 S.Ct. 147 , 11 L.Ed.2d 111 (1963); City of Detroit v. FPC, supra note 219, 97 U.S.App.D.C. at 271-272 , 230 F.2d at 821-822 231 See North Cent.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodward Iron Company v. United States
See also Wright Contracting Co. v. C.I.R., 5 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 249, 254 , cert. den., 375 U.S. 878 , 84 S.Ct. 147 , 11 L.Ed.2d 110 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. United States, 1965, 352 F.2d 807, 809-811 , 173 Ct.Cl. 606 (and cases cited therein).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 277.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1963.
Harry S. Littman, Joseph J. Daniels, Dale A. Wright, Richard Littell and Melvin Richter for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for respondent. John T. Miller, Jr. for Independent Natural Gas Assn, of America, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Consideration, Took.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.