Barnes v. North Carolina, 375 U.S. 28 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Barnes v. North Carolina, 375 U.S. 28 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Casias v. State (texcrimapp, 1970-04-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Casias v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Salas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d 174 , cert. dism. 375 U.S. 15 , 84 S.Ct. 96 , 11 L.Ed.2d 45 ; Ex parte Rogers, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 559 ; Article 7256, Vernon’s Ann.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barnes
v.
North Carolina
385 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
375 U.S. 28
Samuel S. Mitchell for petitioner., Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Harlan, Wainwright.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.