Chem. Bank New York Trust Co. v. Kennedy, 375 U.S. 965 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Chem. Bank New York Trust Co. v. Kennedy, 375 U.S. 965 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ernest Clifford Lucas v. United States (ca10, 1966-01-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Ernest Clifford Lucas v. United States
10th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hughes v. United States, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 459 , cert. denied 375 U.S. 966 , 84 S.Ct. 483 , 11 L.Ed.2d 415 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dissmeyer v. State
Kan. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Thirty-Six Pinball Machines, 222 Kan. 416, 417-22 , 565 P.2d 236 (1977); see also Grigsby v. Mitchum, 191 Kan. 293, 301 , 380 P.2d 363 (1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 966 , 84 S.Ct. 483 , 11 L.Ed.2d 415 (1964) (whether pinball machines are gambling devices depends on use and not on how labeled or designed).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seven-Up Bottling Company, Etc. v. The Seven-Up Company, Etc., and Seven-Up Services Incorporated, Etc. (2×)
8th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pacific Supply Cooperative v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 318 F.2d 894, 906-09 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 483 , 11 L.Ed.2d 414 (1964). 3 The district court held that Bottling’s admitted status as a trademark licensee of the Company estops Bottling from claiming the exclusive right to use the Seven-Up trademarks for all forms of finished soft drinks in its territory: In plaintiff Bottling’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (hereinafter cited as “Memo in Opposition”), at page 1, it is stated…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.
v.
Kennedy, Attorney General
No. 550.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1964.
375 U.S. 965
Orison S. Marden, Brackley Shaw and Asbury H. deYampert for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Alan S. Rosenthal and John C. Eldridge for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.