green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“we know that the mere existence of a parent-subsidiary relationship is not alone sufficient" to subject a foreign parent to jurisdiction if "the independence of the local subsidiary is a reality”
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Milken
we know that the mere existence of a parent-subsidiary relationship is not alone sufficient" to subject a foreign parent to jurisdiction if "the independence of the local subsidiary is a reality
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Franklin Andrew Day, Charles Leroy Jones, and John Watie Bias
See Bacino v. United States, 316 F.2d 11, 14 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. Cassel
See Bacino v. United States, 316 F.2d 11, 14 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cubeiro v. Sun Seaway Enterprises, Inc.
See the cases cited in Monteiro, supra, at 572-73 and also Caribbean Federation Lines v. Dahl, 315 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963), and Cerda v. Eletson Maritime Corp., 515 F.Supp. 883, 886 (E.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gkiafis v. Steamship Yiosonas
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P. R.) Inc., 316 F.2d 695, 697 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963): “[T]he state has an interest in subjecting to its judicial process a corporation whose activities in that state expose its residents to a risk of physical harm or economic loss; the state’s interest in regulating such objection able conduct within its borders is apparent even though the plaintiff may be a nonresident * * .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hudson Drydocks Inc., a Louisiana Corporation (Formerly Vic's Shipyard, Inc.) v. Wyatt Yachts Inc., a Florida Corporation
See, e.g., Escude Cruz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, 619 F.2d 902, 905-06 (1st Cir.1980) (court analyzed parent corporation’s relationship with its subsidiary using principles of “piercing the corporate veil”; because there was no evidence that parent controlled its subsidiary’s activities, court refused to attribute subsidiary’s actions to the parent for purposes of personal jurisdiction); see also Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P.R.), 316 F.2d 695 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A.
(2×)
See, e.g., Blount v. Peerless Chemicals, Inc., 316 F.2d 695, 697 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963); Compania de Astral v. Boston Metals Co., 205 Md. 237 , 107 A.2d 357 (1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 943 , 75 S.Ct. 365 , 99 L.Ed. 638 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oddi v. Mariner-Denver, Inc.
See, e. g., Blount v. Peerless Chemicals, Inc., 316 F.2d 695, 698 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963); Bland v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 338 F.Supp. 871 (S.D.Tex.1971); 2 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 4.25[6], at 4-273 (2d ed. 1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Claude B. Morgan v. United States
See also United States v. Miller, 2 Cir. 1967, 381 F.2d 529 , 539-540 and Bacino v. United States, 10 Cir.1963, 316 F.2d 11 , cert. den., 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snyder v. Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc.
See also Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P.R.) Inc., Second Circuit 1963, 316 F. 2d 695 , cert, denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S. Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 , Long v. Victor Products Corp. (8th Cir. 1962) 297 F.2d 577 ; Powell v. Sealectro Inc., 205 F. Supp. 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gkiafis v. Steamship Yiosonas
"However minimal the burden of defending in a foreign tribunal, a defendant may not be called upon to do so unless he has had the `minimal contacts' with that State that are a prerequisite to its exercise of power over him." Hanson v. Denkla, 357 U.S. 235, 251 , 78 S. Ct. 1228, 1238 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958); see also Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P.R.) Inc., 316 F.2d 695 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 76 , 11 L.Ed.2d 62 (1963); Note, 75 Harv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caribbean Federation Lines
v.
Dahl
v.
Dahl
No. 319.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
C. A. L. Johnstone, Jr. for petitioner. Raymond H. Kierr for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.