green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Edward Dunham
See Westfall v. United States, 274 U.S. 256 , 47 S.Ct. 629 , 71 L.Ed. 1036 (1927); see also Toles v. United States, 308 F.2d 590, 594 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 79 , 11 L.Ed.2d 66 (1963). *46 Dunham’s argument that the federal courts are without jurisdiction to conduct proceedings regarding the robbery of a federally insured state bank has no arguable basis in law or in fact and is thus frivolous.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McPherson
See also Toles v. United States, 308 F.2d 590 (9th Cir. 1962) cert. denied, 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 79 , 11 L.Ed.2d 66 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eldridge Allen, (Two Cases)
See, e. g., Toles v. United States, 308 F.2d 590 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 79 , 11 L.Ed.2d 66 (1963); Mosco v. United States, 301 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billie A. Bryant v. United States
See also Toles v. United States, 308 F.2d 590, 594 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 79 , 11 L.Ed.2d 66 , rehearing denied, 375 U.S. 949 , 84 S.Ct. 353 , 11 L.Ed.2d 280 ; Way v. United States, 268 F.2d 785 (10th Cir.); and see note 3, infra. 3 . § 2113.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joel Franklin Levine
See also Toles *574 v. United States, 9 Cir., 308 F.2d 590, at 593 (1962), cert. den. 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 79 , 11 L.Ed.2d 66 . 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Scarnato
v.
J. E. Lavallee
v.
J. E. Lavallee
8, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
Petitioner pro se., Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Per Curiam, Stewart.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Fay v. Noia, 372 U. S. 391.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.