green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 409-10, 324 F.2d 436, 441-42 (1963) (Washington, J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 975 (1964). 9 Affirmed. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony J. Bottiglio v. United States
“Ineffective counsel,” in the constitutional sense, means representation “such as to make the trial a mockery, a sham or a farce.” Johnson v. United States, 10 Cir., 1967, 380 F.2d 810, 812 ; accord, United States v. Horton, 2 Cir., 1964, 334 F.2d 153, 155 , Smith v. United States, D.C.Cir., 1963, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 324 F.2d 436, 440 , cert. denied 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 ; Dodd v. United States, 9 Cir., 1963, 321 F.2d 240, 243 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. United States
See Trujillo v. United States (Fifth Cir. 1967), 377 F.2d 266 , cert. den. 389 U.S. 899 , 88 S.Ct. 224 , 19 L.Ed.2d 221 , and Smith v. United States (1963), 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 324 F.2d 436 , cert. den. 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 .
cited
Cited "see"
John H. Davenport v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 324 F.2d 436 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Melvin B. Bishop v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 116 U.S.App.DC. 404, 408, 324 F.2d 436, 440 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William R. Durant v. United States
Compare Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964) with Trujillo v. United States, 377 F.2d 266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 899 , 88 S.Ct. 224 , 19 L.Ed.2d 221 (1967) and Smith v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 324 F.2d 436 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Epifanio Trujillo v. United States
Compare Smith v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 404 , 324 F.2d 436 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 978 , 11 L.Ed.2d 975 (1964), with Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356, 361 (9th Cir. 1964).
Allison
v.
Holman, Warden
v.
Holman, Warden
No. 1002, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1964.
Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Tyson III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.