green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Lowder, 256 Iowa 853, 864 , 129 N.W.2d 11 (1964), cert. denied 380 U.S. 965 , 85 S.Ct. 1110 , 14 L.Ed.2d 155 ; Code §§ 780.19, 780.20; Iowa R.Civ.P. 199.
cited
Cited "see"
Motel Corporation v. Motel Corporation
See Olympic Finance Co. v. Thyret, 337 F.2d 62, 68 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965); Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. U. S. A. Motel Corp.
See Olympic Finance Co. v. Thyret, 337 F.2d 62, 68 (9th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965); Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Guerrant
See Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910, 912 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.
Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 26 , 56 S.Ct. 23, 31 , 80 L.Ed. 9 (1935); see also Leslie Salt Co. v. Froehlke, 578 F.2d 742 (9th Cir.1978), where the Court observed, 578 F.2d at 750 , that after Borax, “the test of the mean high water mark became the inveterate standard to be applied in limiting federal authority over navigable waters.” It follows that “navigable water” and thus the boundary of admiralty jurisdiction in tidal areas does not ebb and flow with the tide but extends to the mean high water mark at all times, because “[wjheth er, at the time …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles R. Hassinger, Administrator of the Estate of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Mead Proctor, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Diego Proctor and James B. Powell, Administrator of the Estate of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Electric Membership Corporation, and Coleman Company, Inc. And Coast Catamaran Corporation, Charles R. Hassinger, Administrator of the Estate of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Meade Proctor, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Diego Proctor and James B. Powell, Administrator of the Estate of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Electric Membership Corporation, and Coleman Company, Inc. And Coast Catamaran Corporation
Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 26 , 56 S.Ct. 23, 31 , 80 L.Ed. 9 (1935); see also Leslie Salt Co. v. Froehlke, 578 F.2d 742 (9th Cir.1978), where the Court observed, 578 F.2d at 750 , that after Borax, "the test of the mean high water mark became the inveterate standard to be applied in limiting federal authority over navigable waters." 8 It follows that "navigable water" and thus the boundary of admiralty jurisdiction in tidal areas does not ebb and flow with the tide but extends to the mean high water mark at all times, because "[w]hether, at the time the injur…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirkaldy v. Alamo Chemical Transportation Co.
See, e. g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. den., 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Guillory v. Levingston Shipbuilding Co.
See, e.g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C. C. Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation
See, e. g., Hastings v. Mann, 340 F.2d 910 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 963 , 85 S.Ct. 1106 , 14 L.Ed.2d 153 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burton Mercantile & Gin Co., Inc.
v.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
v.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
No. 910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1965.
Wayne Boyce and Fred M. Pickens, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin, Robert E. Nagle and Isabelle R. Cappello for respondent.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.