green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“exemplary damages and attorneys' fees are not money claims triable by jury, although they are awarded in a legal action.”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Younis Bros. & Co., Inc. v. CIGNA Worldwide Ins. Co.
exemplary damages and attorneys' fees are not money claims triable by jury, although they are awarded in a legal action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera Rosa v. Citibank, N.A.
See, Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5 th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965). 2 After discussing both approaches, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held it was “of the view that the discretion under Rule 39(b) is very broad and that the case would be very rare indeed where a district court abused its discretion in denying or granting a Rule 39(b) motion.” Rowlett, 832 F.2d, at p. 200 .
cited
Cited "see"
Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15, 19-20 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff'd, 336 F.2d 406 (5 Cir.1964), *115 ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); E-I-M Co. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc., 223 F.2d 36 (5th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 933 , 76 S.Ct. 304 , 100 L.Ed. 815 (1956); Jeoffroy Manufacturing, Inc. v. Graham, 206 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 920 , 74 S.Ct. 515 , 98 L.Ed. 1075 (1954); Pyle National Co. v. Lewin, 92 F.2d 628 (7th Cir.1937); Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. White Cap Co., 47 F.Supp. 451 (D.Del.1942).
cited
Cited "see"
Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 , 142 USPQ 291 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Verdia JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BIRDSONG, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
Accord, Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S. Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Albert v. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosack v. Volvo of America Corp.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex. 1963), affd., 336 F.2d 406 , 415 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 14 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).” (Freeman, Current Issues in Class Action Litigation, supra, 70 F.R.D. 251 , 267-268, fn. omitted.) Various practical methods have been devised to expeditiously facilitate the calculation of individual damages, including bifurcation and the creation of subclasses.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Shrader's Inc.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff’d., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) (jury trial; trial of damage issue in patent cases is “often difficult and expensive” yet “easily severed” from liability questions; additional opportunity for avoiding or settling damage issue created by separation; nonmovants failed to show “serious prejudice” in separation) (on appeal, court could not “think of an instance in a patent action where the damage issue is so interwoven with the other issues” that separ…
cited
Cited "see"
DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates
See Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenouri v. WAPA-TV Pegasus Broadcasting of San Juan, Inc.
Id.; see also Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mag Instrument, Inc. v. J. Baxter Brinkmann International Corp.
See, e.g., Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Slater Electric, Inc. v. Indian Head, Inc., 38 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. Palermo
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2334 at 112 (1971); see also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 408-09 (5th Cir.1964) (untimely demand for jury trial under Rule 38(b) has the effect of a motion for jury trial under Rule 39(b)), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee Pharmaceuticals v. Mishler
See also Swofford v. B & W, Incorporated, 336 F.2d 406 , 410 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleveland J. Stockton and Dorothy Altman Stockton v. John A. Altman, and Eleanor Altman Curran
See also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 5th Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 406 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) and Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp., 5th Cir. 1961, 294 F.2d 486 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petition of Petrol Shipping Corporation, as Owner of Tanker Atlantis, for an Order Directing the Kingdom of Greece, Ministry of Commerce, Purchase Directorate, to Proceed to Arbitration
Compare Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423-427 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964). 35 In the light of the above, we are not disposed to follow Oster v. Dominion of Canada, 144 F.Supp. 746 (N.D.N.Y.), aff'd 238 F.2d 400 (2 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 353 U.S. 936 , 77 S.Ct. 813 , 1 L.Ed.2d 759 (1957), 3 or Purdy Co. v. Argentina, 333 F.2d 95 (7 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965), to the extent they hold that a sovereign cannot be served in federal court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nash
v.
N. V. Nederlandsche Schoenen-Lederfabrieken Bata-Best
v.
N. V. Nederlandsche Schoenen-Lederfabrieken Bata-Best
No. 586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Harold E. Stassen and John Alvin Groghan for petitioner. John Dickey, J. Roger Wollenberg and Max O. Truitt,. Jr., for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.