green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Turner Industries Group, LLC v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450
he employer's ... allegations by way of defense ... that the union breached the no-strike clause ... did not release (the employer) from its duty to arbitrate the union's claim that employees had been wrongfully discharged.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Fonte and Gilda Fonte v. The Board of Managers of Continental Towers Condominium
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. American International Aluminum Corp., 334 F.2d 147, 149 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 611 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bruce Hanson and Irene C. Hanson v. Town of Flower Mound
See generally United Steelworkers of America v. American Int’l Aluminum Corp., 334 F.2d 147 , 150 & n.4 (5th Cir. 1964) (Rule 12(b) motion treated in part as Rule 56 motion for summary judgment), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 611 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
District Council No. 38 International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Williams Contracting, Inc.
See United Steelworkers v. American International Aluminum Corp., 334 F.2d 147, 152 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. den., 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 611 ; Sinclair Refining Co. v. N.L.R.B., 306 F.2d 569, 576-8 (5th Cir. 1962).
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. General Electric Co.
See United Steelworkers of America v. American Int’l Aluminum Corp., 334 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 611 (1965) ; Lodge No. 12, Dist.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. George E. Light Boat Storage, Inc.
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. American International Aluminum Corp., 5 Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 147, 152 , cert. denied, 1965, 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Serna
See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53 , certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 . * * * ” See, also, Martinez v. Flores, 9 Cir., 299 F.2d 888 , and cases therein cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Serna
See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53 , certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 . * * *" 4 See, also, Martinez v. Flores, 9 Cir., 299 F.2d 888 , and cases therein cited. 5 The appeal is dismissed.
cited
Cited "see"
James E. Garrison v. Alonzo L. Lacey, Special Agent, E. M. Garnett, U.S. Commissioner, and mr.baylark, U.S. Marshal
See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53 , certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 2188 v. Western Electric Company, Incorporated
(2×)
See, also, United Steelworkers of America v. American International Aluminum Corp., 334 F.2d 147, 150 (5 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 991 , 85 S.Ct. 702 , 13 L.Ed.2d 611 (1965)..
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kristovich, Public Administrator
v.
Shu Tong Ng
v.
Shu Tong Ng
No. 688.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1965.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.