green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "see"
in Re Tom Thomas, Dan Sheehan and Marc Culp, Individually and as Successor to the Interest of Thomas, Sheehan & Culp, L.L.P
(3×)
See id. at authority which would allow an offset to the party who has 663, 106 S.Ct, 3143 (citing Tawgow v, Taylor, 344 F,2d 781 breached a contract for a 'tax savings' the non-breaching party (1st Circuit)), cert, denied 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 'realized' as a result of the breach." Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Lee
(2×)
See id. at 663 , 106 S.Ct. 3143 (citing Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Circuit)), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965). 406 U.S. at 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelsen v. Research Corp. of the University of Hawaii
See Smith v. United States, 346 F.2d 449, 453 (4th Cir.1965) (immaterial whether charter agreement constitutes vessel operator a bareboat charterer, owner pro hac vice, or independent contractor), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Lovetro v. United States, 602 F.Supp. 574 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutt v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 ([1st Cir.] 1965), [cert. denied], 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,310 Joseph L. Maggio v. Gerard Freezer & Ice Co.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783-84 (1st Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Federal Insurance Co. v. Summers, 330 F.Supp. 1041, 1044 (D.Mass.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
FMC Corp. v. Boesky
(2×)
See Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1473 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972) and Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965) (both discussing only the proper measure of damages).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abelson v. Strong
(2×)
Id. n. 20; see Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
examined
Cited "see"
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. James E. MacDONALD, Jr., Defendant, Appellant
(4×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1968), approved in Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1473 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972). 2 At the very least, the burden is on the wrongdoer to prove the appropriateness of a lower measure.
discussed
Cited "see"
Salinsky v. Perma-Home Corp.
See Soares v. Lakeville Baseball Camp, Inc., 369 Mass. 974, 975 (1976). 5 By contrast the Federal rule is “established with more liberality than . . . [the law] of Massachusetts.” Under the Federal rule, “where fraud is involved the cause of action is . . . automatically concealed, and does not arise until discovery.” See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 (1965); Cook v. Avien, Inc., 573 F.2d 685, 694-695 (1st Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cottrell v. Crouse (In Re Crouse)
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor (1 Cir., 1965) 344 F.2d 781 , cert. den. 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 , and cases digested in Damages, key numbers 67, 69, and Fraud, key number 60, Wests Federal Practice Digest, 2nd Series.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cusanelli v. Klaver
See Smith v. United States, 346 F.2d 449 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Carter v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 411 F.2d 1185 (2d Cir. 1969); Doyle v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 504 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1974). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Holtzman v. Proctor, Cook & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
American General Insurance v. Equitable General Corp.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 [ 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 ] (1965). 406 U.S. at 155 , 92 S.Ct. at 1473.
discussed
Cited "see"
Holmes v. Bateson
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783 (1st Cir.), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holmes v. Bateson
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levine v. MacNeil
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1976
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 ( 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 ) (1965). 35 406 U.S. 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1473 . 36 In Janigan the circuit court distinguished between the measure of damages for a defrauded seller and a defrauded buyer: 37 . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nickels v. Koehler Management Corp.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 [ 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 ] (1965). 406 U.S. 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1473 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Occidental Life Insurance Co. of North Carolina v. Pat Ryan & Associates, Inc.
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1974
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965). 30 In Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir. 1965), cited and relied upon by the Supreme Court as quoted above, the court appears to make the disgorgement of windfall profits theory applicable only to the case of the defrauded seller, and not a defrauded buyer like Associates. 6 However, in Zeller v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corporation, 476 F.2d 795, 801-802 (2nd Cir. 1973) (Friendly, C.J.), the court cast doubt on that rule, stating: 31 The reason why the remedy…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,023 United California Bank v. Charles E. Salik
(2×)
Accord Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
(2×)
See Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F. 2d 781, 786 (CA1 1965), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 879 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tobacco Workers International Union, Local 317 v. Lorillard Corporation
See Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Amalgamated Ass’n, etc., Motor Coach Employees Division 1318, 343 F. *954 2d 815, 818 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 164 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Carey v. General Electric, 315 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1963); cert. denied, 377 U.S. 908 , 84 S.Ct. 1162 , 12 L.Ed.2d 179 (1964); Local Lodge No. 595 of District No. 152, Intern.
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Owens, 346 F.2d 329 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wenzel v. Mathies
(2×)
See, e.g., Estate of Jones v. Kvamme, 449 N.W.2d 428, 432 (Minn.1989); see also Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.1965) (profits may be considered even when it is speculative that plaintiffs would actually have profited in same way had they retained stock), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 , (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Servis v. Hiller Systems Inc.
See, e.g., Smith v. United States, 346 F.2d 449 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Petition of United States, 367 F.2d 505, 510 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, Black v. United States, 386 U.S. 932 , 87 S.Ct. 953 , 17 L.Ed.2d 805 (1967); Landry v. United States, 815 F.Supp. 1000 (E.D.Tex.1993); Tarver v. United States, 785 F.Supp. 607 (S.D.Miss.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bingham v. Zolt
(2×)
See also Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965) (“It is more appropriate to give the defrauded party the benefit even of windfalls than to let the fraudulent party keep them.” Id. at 786).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Pidcock v. Sunnyland America, Inc.
(2×)
See also Thomas v. Duralite Co., Inc., 524 F.2d 577, 587-88 (3d Cir.1975), Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 787 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1987
(2×)
See, e.g., Rochez Bros. v. Rhoads, 491 F.2d 402 , 415 (3d Cir.1974) (quoting Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965)); see also Randall v. Loftsgaarden, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3143 , 92 L.Ed.2d 525 (1986); Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1473 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
(2×)
See, e.g., Rochez Bros. v. Rhoads, 491 F.2d 402 , 415 (3d Cir.1974) (quoting Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 786 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965)); see also Randall v. Loftsgaarden, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3143 , 92 L.Ed.2d 525 (1986); Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1473 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cruz v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
See also, Smith v. United States, 346 F.2d 449 (4th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); Basile v. United States, Civil No. 80-2453 (D.Mass.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co.
(2×)
See also Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Company
(2×)
See also Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 783 (1st Cir. 1965), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp.
(2×)
Compare Janigan v. Taylor (C.A.l) 344 F.2d 781 , cert. denied 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965), and see Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., supra. I am satisfied that, in any event, were it clear that plaintiff and members of her class are entitled to more than out-of-pocket damages, namely rescission, defendants in such event would be entitled to a return of the offering price for their stock of $12 plus interest at a rate equivalent to what a prudent investor would have earned on such moneys over the same period, namely 13.1%, so that from October 1974 to October 1978 the $12…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herm v. Stafford
(2×)
See, e. g., Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Klein v. Shields & Co., 470 F.2d 1344 (2d Cir. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forrestal Village, Inc. v. Katharine Graham
(2×)
See, e. g., Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 782 , 783 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Klein v. Shields & Co., 470 F.2d 1344, 1346 (2d Cir. 1972); Hudak v. Economic Research Analysts, Inc., 499 F.2d 996, 999 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1122 , 95 S.Ct. 805 , 42 L.Ed.2d 821 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korn v. Merrill
(2×)
See, e. g., Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Vanderboom v. Sexton, 422 F.2d 1233, 1240 (8th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gilmore
See, e. g., United States v. Sturgis, 342 F.2d 328 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 164 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaney v. Western States Title Insurance Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965); Estate Counseling Service, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 303 F.2d 527, 533 (10th Cir. 1962). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kovalchick
See also United States v. Sturgis, 342 F.2d 328 (3 Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 164 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
Janigan
v.
Taylor
v.
Taylor
No. 408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1965.
Matthew Brown for petitioner., Charles C. Cabot, Jr., for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.