green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1977 ·
…the basic test of 'materiality,' on the other hand, is whether 'a reasonable man would attach importance (to the fact misrepresented) in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1977 ·
…the basic test of 'materiality,' on the other hand, is whether 'a reasonable man would attach importance in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goldberg v. Meridor
(2×)
the basic test of 'materiality,' on the other hand, is whether 'a reasonable man would attach importance (to the fact misrepresented) in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goldberg v. Meridor
(2×)
the basic test of 'materiality,' on the other hand, is whether 'a reasonable man would attach importance in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Synchronoss Securities Litigation
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 , reh’g denied, 382 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 305 , 15 L.Ed.2d 344 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 , reh’g denied, 382 U.S. 933 , 86 *292 S.Ct. 305, 15 L.Ed.2d 344 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Panfil v. ACC CORP.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 464 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) (insider’s knowledge that company’s board had resolved to seek a merger or sale and had been informed that unknown purchaser was interested in acquiring company not material).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International
(2×)
See Eastern Air Lines v. Flight Engineers International Association, 340 F.2d 104 (5th Cir.) (mediation board procedures not exhausted during a major dispute is not itself sufficient to enjoin strike), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 59 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grigsby v. CMI Corp.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grigsby v. Cmi Corporation
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reingold v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) (“Assuredly, to abandon the requirement of reliance would be to facilitate outsiders’ proof of insiders’ fraud, and to that extent the interpretation for which plaintiff contends might advance the purposes of Rule 10b-5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. Newman
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Safecard Services, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson & Staley, Inc. v. Bushan & Levy, P. C.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Metals Corp. v. Tomlin
(2×)
E. g., Globus v. Law Research Services, Inc., 418 F.2d 1276, 1291-92 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 913 , 90 S.Ct. 913 , 25 L.Ed.2d 93 (1970); see List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Kerrigan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 639, 643 (S.D.N.Y.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re United States
(2×)
See United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837, 843-44 (3d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1966) (IRS); 18 U.S.C. § 3107 (1976) (FBI).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Installation of a Pen Register or Touch-Tone Decoder and a Terminating Trap. Appeal of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America for an Orderauthorizing the Installation of a Pen Register or a Touch-Tone Decoder Andtermination Trap Facilities. Appeal of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. In the Matter of the Application of the United States for an Order Authorizinga Telephone Tracer. Appeal of New Jersey Bell Telephone Company
(2×)
See United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837, 843-44 (3d Cir. 1965), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1966) (IRS); 18 U.S.C. § 3107 (1976) (FBI).
cited
Cited "see"
Simko v. Marine Maintenance Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673, 674-75 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Simko v. C & C Marine Maintenance Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673, 674-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kerrigan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harriman v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Rochez Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeRobertis v. Crimmins
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, 340 F.2d 457 , 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gordon v. Burr
(2×)
See generally, List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., List v. Lerner, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965), and find substantial evidence in the record to support its application of the standard to Lord's two statements.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gordon v. Burr
(2×)
See generally, List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., List v. Lerner, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965), and find substantial evidence in the record to support its application of the standard to Lord’s two statements.
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman Burris v. Golbal Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-Party-Defendant
(2×)
See Gilchrist, supra, 405 F.2d at 769 . 2 For this proposition, the Gilchrist court relied on dicta in Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,457 J. Arthur White v. Paul Abrams, Robert Hoffman v. Paul Abrams, Robert Hoffman v. Paul Abrams, J. Arthur White v. Paul Abrams
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) (purpose of rule 10b-5 is to qualify the rule of caveat emptor-- not to establish a scheme of investors' insurance).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
(2×)
See note 15 infra 9 360 F.Supp. at 889 10 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) 11 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) Edward Ryan and Ryan Homes do not squarely meet Harnett's arguments that the district court's finding regarding the insubstantial nature of Edward Ryan's thoughts was erroneous and that the district court's conclusion that the omission was not material was incorrect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
(2×)
See note 15 infra. . 360 F.Supp. at 889 . . 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). . 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
examined
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,481 Hilda Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation
(4×)
See Korn v. Franchard Corp., 456 F.2d 1206, 1209 (2d Cir. 1972) (Korn II). 12 21 Citing our decision in List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965), ITT next argues that common issues of fact and law do not predominate over questions affecting only individual members for purposes of Rule 23(b)(3) because reliance by each shareholder is a necessary prerequisite to his recovery.
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Abrams
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) (purpose of rule 10b-5 is to qualify the rule of caveat emptor — not to establish a scheme of investors’ insurance).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael Soriano
(4×)
See United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837, 843 (CA3), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965). .
cited
Cited "see"
Dreyer v. Jalet
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iannelli
(2×)
See United States v. Hanon, 428 F.2d 101 *181 (8th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 402 U.S. 952 , 91 S.Ct. 1608 , 29 L.Ed.2d 122 , and while the Fifth Amendment contention was not precisely raised in United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837 (3rd Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 , the Court of Appeals of this Circuit did allow seizure of records similar to those involved in the case at bar.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,122 John R. Lewis Inc. And Glenn E. Hinton, Investments, Inc. v. Hal C. Newman
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 2 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 457, 462 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 ; Gilbert v. Nixon, 10 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 348, 355-356 , and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Hobart v. Sohio Petroleum Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 3d Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 673 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
W. W. Hobart, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Ray McClure Hobart, Deceased v. Sohio Petroleum Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Oil Transport Company, and Greenville Towing Company, Third-Party Defendants-Third Party v. W. W. Hobart, Third-Party
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 3d Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 673 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
examined
Cited "see"
Albert E. Kuehnert v. Texstar Corporation
(4×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 2 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 457, 462 , 22 A.L.R.3d 782 , cert. denied 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 , 461-62 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Cochran v. Channing Corp., 211 F.Supp. 239, 243 (SDNY 1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., a Texas Corporation, Charles F. Fogarty, Richard D. Mollison, Walter Holyk, Kenneth H. Darke, Francis G. Coates, Claude O. Stephens, John A. Murray, Earl L. Huntington, and Harold B. Kline, Defendants- Securities and Exchange Commission v. David M. Crawford and Richard H. Clayton
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 , 461-62 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Cochran v. Channing Corp., 211 F.Supp. 239, 243 (SDNY 1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cohen v. Colvin
(2×)
See List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Barnett v. Anaconda Co., supra. Here, all indications point to the fact that rather than sustaining damages, the corporation benefited from the actions of the defendants.
examined
Cited "see"
MUTUAL SHARES CORPORATION v. Genesco, Inc.
(4×)
See, List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.) (no materiality where a director bought shares in his company knowing that the board had resolved to sell or merge the company relying upon its union manager's representation that he knew someone who might be interested in buying the company, although he had not disclosed the buyer’s identity), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); In re Gen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berman v. Gerber Products Co.
(2×)
See, e. g., List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulpher Co., 258 F.Supp. 262, 277 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miah
(2×)
See also United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837 (3d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1966); United States v. Kennedy, supra, at 67.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Selva
(2×)
See also United States v. Sigal, 341 F.2d 837 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965); Calhoun v. United States, 384 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 1967), where we stated, “Failure to transcribe the entire court proceedings in violation of the statutory requirement is not reversible error per se.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lorber v. Beebe
(2×)
See, e. g., List v. Fashion Park, Inc. (2d Cir. 1965) 340 F.2d 457, 462 , cert. den., 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
IIT v. Vencap, Ltd.
(2×)
See e. g., Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Goldmuntz, 464 F.2d 876, 887 (2d Cir. 1972). *1107 The Second Circuit has stated the test of materiality to be “whether a reasonable man would attach importance [to that information] in determining his choice of action in the transaction in question.” 12 List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Duralite Company, Inc.
(2×)
See also, List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 382 U. S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klapmeier v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
(2×)
Compare, List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) (defining reliance) with Berryman v. Riegert, supra, 286 Minn, at 277-278, 175 N.W.2d at 438 (defining reliance).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,503 Paul S. Dopp v. Franklin National Bank, and Butler Aviation International, Inc.
(4×)
See, e. g., List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
v.
Flight Engineers' International Association
v.
Flight Engineers' International Association
No. 64.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
E. Smythe Cambrell and W. Cien Harlan for petitioner., I. J. Gromfine and Herman Sternstein for respondents., Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander, Sherman L. Cohn and John C. Eldridge for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (4)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.