green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Bales, A/K/A Bob Bailes, A/K/A Robert E. Bailes
See Downing v. United States, 348 F.2d 594, 599 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aubrey Baker Davis, Jr., A/K/A Junior Baker Davis, A/K/A Baker Davis, and Margaret Davis
See Downing v. United States, 348 F.2d 594, 598 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DePugh
See, Downing v. United States, 348 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 ; Schook v. United States, 337 F.2d 563, 567 (8th Cir. 1964); Willis v. United States, 289 F.2d 581, 584 (8th Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. TheLaw. Net Corp.
See, e.g., Seven-Up Co. v. Get Up Corp., 340 F.2d 954 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
See, e.g., Seven-Up Co. v. Get Up Corp., 340 F.2d 954 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Lee Johnson
Compare Downing v. United States, 348 F.2d 594 , 599 n. 7 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alfred Dallago v. United States
Compare Downing v. United States, 348 F.2d 594, 601 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 (1965). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucien Rivard, Charles Emile Groleau, Julien Gagnon and Joseph Raymond Jones v. United States
See also Downing v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 348 F.2d 594 , cert. den. 382 U.S. 901 , 86 S.Ct. 235 , 15 L.Ed.2d 155 , where this Court held that the District Court for the Western District of Texas had jurisdiction and venue over a defendant who was indicted for conspiracy and substantive counts in the Western District of Texas for a conspiracy formed in Oklahoma with all overt acts occurring in Texas, although the defendant had never been in Texas, nor had he ever communicated with anyone there.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Seven-Up Co.
v.
Get Up Corp.
v.
Get Up Corp.
No. 444.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
Beverly W. Pattishall for petitioner., Walter J. Halliday for respondent.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.