green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
“in determining whether the defendants are subject to jurisdiction under the long-arm statute____the entire transaction must be considered.”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Citicorp International Trading Co. v. Western Oil & Refining Co.
in determining whether the defendants are subject to jurisdiction under the long-arm statute____the entire transaction must be considered.
discussed
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Transpacific Corp. (In Re Commodore International, Ltd.)
See Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 790 (2d Cir.1999) (citing Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965)); Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, 28-29 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. v. the College Football Ass'n
See Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 912 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (exclusive rights to motion picture exhibitor to show film commercially justifiable as reaching largest number of viewers with smallest number of prints and enabling first-run theatres to charge premium prices and to receive benefit of word-of-mouth advertising); Sandura Co. v. FTC, 339 F.2d 847, 852-53 (6th Cir.1964) (vertical agreement to create closed geographical areas for distribution of floor coverings justified by need to promote sales …
cited
Cited "see"
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Company
See Naumkeag Theatre Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 914 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
See Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc. (1965), 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied sub nom., Estwing Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Singer (1965), 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Linda Stout, by Her Father and Next Friend, Blevin Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education, United States of America v. The Board of Education of the City of Fairfield, United States of America v. The Board of Education of the City of Bessemer, United States of America v. Caddo Parish School Board, United States of America v. The Bossier Parish School Board, Margaret M. Johnson v. Jackson Parish School Board, Yvornia Decarol Banks v. Claiborne Parish School Board
School authorities may act to offset racial imbalance: See Addabbo v. Donovan, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S.2d 178 , aff'd 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 (1965), cert. den'd 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education
School authorities may act to offset racial imbalance: See Addabbo v. Donovan, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S.2d 178 , aff’d 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 (1965), cert. den’d 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olson v. Board of Ed. of U. Free Sch. Dist. No. 12, Malverne, NY
See, Addabbo v. Donovan, App.Div. 2d Dep’t, 1965, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S. 2d 178 , aff’d, 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S. 2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 . 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. Naughton
A nondomiciliary “transacts business” under CPLR 302(a)(1) when he “ ‘purposefully avails [himself] of the privilege of conducting activities within [New York], thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws,’ ” McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp., 20 N.Y.2d 377, 382 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 34 , 229 N.E.2d 604 (1967) (quoting Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1239-40 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958)); accord Mayes v. Leipziger, 674 F.2d 178, 183 (2d Cir.1982); see also Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 457 n. 5, 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 ,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Four Seasons Gardening & Landscaping, Inc. v. Crouch
See also Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 8 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8, 18 , 209 N.E.2d 68, 75 , cert. denied 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Ethyl Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 911-12 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors); Modem Home Inst.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Neiman D/B/A London Group (1974) v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd., James Gourlay and Ingleram Investments, Ltd.
Compare Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1966), with Braband v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 72 Ill.2d 548, 557 , 21 Ill.Dec. 888, 892 , 382 N.E.2d 252, 256 (1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 928 , 99 S.Ct. 2857 , 61 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hutton v. Piepgras
See e. g., Singer v. Walker, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965); Wurtenberger v. Cunard Line Ltd., 370 F.Supp. 342 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amins v. Life Support Medical Equipment Corp.
Compare McKee with the substantial contacts that were the basis of § 302(a) (1) jurisdiction in Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Great Lakes Carbon Corp.
v.
Continental Oil Co.
v.
Continental Oil Co.
No. 475.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
Earl Babcock, Wayne L. Benedict and S. W. Planché, Jr., for petitioner., Richard Russell Wolfe and Cullen R. Liskow for respondents.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.