green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“there must be a practical method for combining these small claims, and- the representative action provides that method. the holders of one or two of the debentures in the present action could hardly afford to take the risk of an individual action.”
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dolgow v. Anderson
there must be a practical method for combining these small claims, and- the representative action provides that method. the holders of one or two of the debentures in the present action could hardly afford to take the risk of an individual action.
cited
Cited "see"
Sopcak v. Northern Mountain Helicopter Services
See Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851, 855 (2d Cir.) (discussing jurisdictional requirements of Article 28), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Air Disaster at Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988. Denice H. Rein v. Pan American World Airways Incorporated, in Re Hijacking of Pan American World Airways, Inc. Aircraft at Karachi International Airport, Pakistan on September 5, 1986. Dilip Joshi, Nadya Hussain, Tahra Lodhi, Dilip Parikh, Faraidoon Oshtory v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851, 855 (2d Cir.) ("The basic unit of international law is the nation-state and it is fair to assume, absent clear indications to the contrary, that [the Convention] was written with reference to nation-states, not to areas and subdivisions of nation-states."), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rein v. Pan American World Airways Inc.
See Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851, 855 (2d Cir.) (“The basic unit of international law is the nation-state and it is fair to assume, absent clear indications to the contrary, that [the Convention] was written with reference to nation-states, not to areas and subdivisions of nation-states.”), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Akerman v. Oryx Communications, Inc.
See Escott v. BarChris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2d Cir.1965), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1966); see also Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 560 (2d Cir.1968); Feder, 52 F.R.D. at 184 ; Dolgow, 43 F.R.D. at 484-45 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Warsaw, Poland, Etc.
Lisi v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S.p.A., supra, 370 F.2d at 512 ; accord, Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851, 856 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965); Warren v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 234 F.Supp. 223 (S.D.Cal.1964), rev’d, 352 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Geveke & Co. International, Inc. v. Kompania Di Awa I Elektrisidat Di Korsou N.V.
See Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851, 856 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965); Sanborn v. United States, 453 F.Supp. 651, 654 (E.D.Cal.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines
See Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, 341 F.2d 851, 857 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965). 11 *1199 Assuming, however, that upon remand the defendant is able to introduce evidence supporting its assertion that the ticket was delivered, the question of who bears the burden of establishing delivery or non-delivery becomes significant.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brady v. LAC, Inc.
See Eseott v. Barchris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965); Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,419
See Willheim v. Murchison, 342 F.2d 33, 42 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840 , 86 S.Ct. 36 , 15 L.Ed.2d 82 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. Securities & Exchange Commission
See Willheim v. Murchison, 342 F.2d 33, 42 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840 , 86 S.Ct. 36 , 15 L.Ed.2d 82 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolfson v. Solomon
Smolowe v. Delendo Corp., 136 F.2d 231, 241 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 751 , 64 S.Ct. 56 , 88 L.Ed. 446 (1943); see Escott v. Barchris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, Drexel & Co. v. Hall, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Wolf Corporation
See Escott v. Barchris Const. Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1966) 8 The text of Rule 23 reads: CLASS ACTIONS (a) Prerequisites to a Class Action.
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. Wolf Corp.
See Escott v. Barchris Const. Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1966). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co.
See also Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, 341 F.2d 851, 858 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Company, Ltd.
See also Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, 341 F.2d 851 , 858 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liberty National Bank v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
See, e.g., Exchange National Bank of Olean v. Insurance Company of North America, 341 F.2d 673 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965); Maryland Casualty Company v. State Bank & Trust Company, 425 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrew L. Cunninghame v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
See, e. g., Exchange National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America, 341 F.2d 673, 675 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965); Grand Sheet Metal Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 500 F.Supp. 904, 909 (D.Conn.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pellman v. Cinerama, Inc.
See, e. g., Escott v. Barchris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965); Werfel v. Kramarsky, 61 F.R.D. 674, 682-83 (S.D.N.Y.1974) (MacMahon, J.); Dolgow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 488 (E.D.N.Y.1968) (Weinstein, J.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See, e. g., Hitai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 343 F.2d 466, 468 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 36 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965); Vlissidis v. Anadell, 262 F.2d 398, 400 (7th Cir. 1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
See also Escott v. Barchris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edmund J. Smith v. Canadian Pacific Airways, Ltd.
Compare, e. g., Dunning v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 4 Av.Cas. 17,394 (D.D.C.1954) (judicial subdivision approach), with Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., 341 F.2d 851 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965) (national approach).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sylvia Molitch, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Irish International Airlines, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant
See also Mertens v. Flying Tiger Line, 341 F.2d 851 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 38 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bedding, Curtain and Drapery Workers Union, Local 140 of the United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See also NLRB v. Milk Drivers Local 584, 341 F.2d 29 , 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 39 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hitai
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Francis L. Giordano for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.