Albanese v. N. v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., 382 U.S. 283 (1966). · Go Syfert
Albanese v. N. v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., 382 U.S. 283 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
212 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Clark J. Matthews II (ca2, 1986-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Clark J. Matthews II
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
The Department of Justice guidelines define a "target" as a "person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him/her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant.” United States Attorney’s Manual § 9-11.260 (June 15, 1984); see United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204, 207-08 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965); People v. Steuding, 6 N.Y.2d 214, 216 , 189 N.Y.S.2d 166 , 160 N.E.2d 468 (1959).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sun Myung Moon
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Del Toro, supra, 513 F.2d at 664 ; see United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204, 210 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965).
cited Cited "see" Matter of Wood
S.D.N.Y. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kraus
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965); United States v. Bonacorsa, 73 CR 1069 (E.D.N.Y.
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Dowdy
4th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965); LaRocca v. United States, 337 F.2d 39 (8 Cir. 1964).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ceccerelli
W.D. Pa. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 . 7.
examined Cited "see" Nos. 19395-19397 (3×)
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 398 F.2d 167, 169 (2d Cir. 1968). 6 The order denying appellant's motion to set aside the verdict and to enter judgment in its favor will be affirmed. 1 Reversed on other grounds 382 U.S. 283 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 327 (1965); on remand, 279 F.Supp. 635 (S.D.N.Y. 1967); rev'd 392 F.2d 763 (2d Cir. 1968); rev'd 393 U.S. 74 , 89 S.Ct. 53 , 21 L.Ed.2d 58 (1968); amended decision 393 U.S. 995 , 89 S.Ct. 482 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 461 (1968)
discussed Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Cosme Rosado v. Walter J. Flood, Warden of the Nassau County Jail (2×)
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
The rationale of this doctrine is that the scope of a grand jury inquiry "is not to be limited narrowly," Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. at 282 , 39 S.Ct. at 471 , because it is "an important investigative instrument." United States v. Cleary, 265 F.2d 459, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 936 , 79 S.Ct. 1458 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1548 (1959); see United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Goldenberg
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Di Salvo
S.D.N.Y. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965); United States v. Cleary, 265 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 360 U.S. 936 , 79 S.Ct. 1458 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1548 (1959).
discussed Cited "see" Kitchell v. United States
1st Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 2 Cir., 1965, 348 F.2d 204 , petition for certiorari denied, 9/14/65, 86 S.Ct. 429 ; Jones v. United States, supra, 342 F.2d at 880-882 ; Mulloney v. United States, 1 Cir., 1935, 79 F.2d 566 , cert. den. 296 U.S. 658 , 56 S.Ct. 383 , 80 L.Ed. 468 .
discussed Cited "see" Norman C. Kitchell v. United States of America, William Toomey v. United States of America, Joseph William Cabrera v. United States of America, Albert George Little, Jr. v. United States of America, Pasquale J. Marano, Jr. v. United States
1st Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winter, 2 Cir., 1965, 348 F.2d 204 , petition for certiorari denied, 9/14/65, 86 S.Ct. 429 ; Jones v. United States, supra, 342 F.2d at 880-882 ; Mulloney v. United States, 1 Cir., 1935, 79 F.2d 566 , cert. den. 296 U.S. 658 , 56 S.Ct. 383 , 80 L.Ed. 468 . 20 Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment as to Kitchell, but setting aside the verdicts as to the other appellants, vacating the judgments against them, and directing further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. * By designation 1 The government tried the case with considerable imprecision.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sugar
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Winter, 348 F.2d 204, 207-8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 (1965); United States v. Wolfson, 282 F.Supp. 772, 774 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 437 F.2d 862 (2d Cir.1970); cf. United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1 , 10 n. 8, 93 S.Ct. 764 , 769 n. 8, 35 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973) (citing Winter with approval on this point).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph Stassi, Sr. v. United States
5th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Winter, 2 Cir., 348 F.2d 204 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 955 , 86 S.Ct. 429 , 15 L.Ed.2d 360 ; United States v. Orta, 5 Cir., 253 F.2d 312 , cert. denied 357 U.S. 905 , 78 S.Ct. 1149 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1156 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALBANESE
v.
N. v. NEDERL. AMERIK STOOMV. MAATS. Et Al.
523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1966.
382 U.S. 283
Philip F. DiCostanzo and Robert Klonsky for petitioner in No. 523. Sidney A. Schwartz and Joseph Arthur Cohen for petitioner in No. 557., Edmund F. Lamb for respondent N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. in Nos. 523 and 557 and for petitioner in No. 654., Arthur J. Mandell for the American Trial Lawyers Association Admiralty Section, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 523.
Harlan.
Cited by 42 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of the American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The petition for certiorari in No. 523, Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., is also granted.

We believe that the judgment of the Court of Appeals setting aside the judgment for petitioner Albanese on the ground that the trial court incorrectly charged the jury on the issue of negligence is erroneous. Gutierrez v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 373 U. S. 206.

[*284] In its opinion the Court of Appeals also stated that the District Court incorrectly instructed the jury as to the applicability of the Safety and Health Regulations for Longshoring† on the question of the shipowner’s liability. But we do not read that court’s opinion as making this an independent ground for ordering a new trial. So we not only reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Albanese but reinstate the District Court’s judgment in his favor.

The petitions in No. 557, International Terminal Operating Co. v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.; and No. 654, N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. v. Albanese, are denied.

It is so ordered.

29 CFR §9.1 et seg. (1963), now 29 CFR § 1504.1 (1965), promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under the authority of Public Law 85-742, 72 Stat. 835, 33 U. S. C. §941 (1964 ed.).

Concurrence

MR. Justice Harlan

would have denied certiorari in No. 523, Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., but the writ having been granted, he would have set the issues for plenary consideration. He concurs in the denial of certiorari in No. 557, International Terminal Operating Co. v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., and No. 654, N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. v. Albanese.