green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“the hiring hall is to be administered on a non-discriminatory basis as between union members and non-union members”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Don Lee Bass and Jerome Clarence Fernandez, Cross v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Etc., Local No. 582, Cross
the hiring hall is to be administered on a non-discriminatory basis as between union members and non-union members
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Iraq v. First National City Bank, 241 F.Supp. 567 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (states do not enforce foreign penal laws as a matter of public policy).
cited
Cited "see"
Ringsmuth v. State
Anderson, supra; see Frank v. Tomlinson, 351 F.2d 384 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1028 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethiopian Spice Extraction Share Co. v. Kalamazoo Spice Extraction Co.
See Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (doctrine not applied to King Faisal’s New York bank accounts because only a United States court could compel bank to pay). *1233 In the matter before the Court, the taking of ESESCO shares is a fait accompli and there is nothing a United States court can do about it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Bank Ltd. v. Cosmic International Inc.
The act of state doctrine, of course, is derived from the principle that “[ejvery sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State,” and on this basis the Supreme Court has declared that “the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory.” Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 , 18 S.Ct. 83, 84 , 42 L.Ed. 456 (1897) (emphasis added); see Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 416, 428 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964). 3 The district court below, however, rely…
discussed
Cited "see"
United Bank Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Cosmic International, Inc., Janata Bank and Amin Jute Mills, Ltd. v. Cosmic International, Inc. And Irving Trust Company, Sonali Bank and Nishat Jute Mills, Ltd. v. Irving Trust Company and Cosmic International, Inc., Nishat Jute Mills, Ltd. And National Bank of Pakistan, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Cosmic International, Inc.
Although the Bangladesh plaintiffs acknowledge that no compensation was paid for any of the Pakistani property purportedly seized, they maintain that the act of state doctrine precludes American courts from examining the propriety of any taking effected by Bangladesh law. 7 The act of state doctrine, of course, is derived from the principle that "(e) very sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State," and on this basis the Supreme Court has declared that " the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done wit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
(2×)
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423-427 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964); see Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47, 50-51 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) See generally Hill, The- Law-Making Power of the Federal Courts: Constitutional Preemption, 67 Colum.L.Rev. 1024 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Nastri & Carta Carbone v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co., Inc.
See Republic of Iraq v. First Nat'l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 n. 3 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 648 (1966); Currie, On the Displacement of the Law of the Forum, in Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws 3, 36-39 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Nastri & Carta Carbone v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co.
See Republic of Iraq v. First Nat’l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 n. 3 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 648 (1966); Currie, On the Displacement of the Law of the Forum, in Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws 3, 36-39 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liu v. Republic of China
See Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 400-01 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 926-27 (act of state involved the Cuban government's act of expropriating the property of aliens located within Cuba); see also Republic of Iraq v. First Nat'l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) ("when property confiscated is within the United States at the time of the attempted confiscation, our courts will give effect to acts of state 'only if they are consistent with the policy and law of the United States.' " (quoting Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liu v. Republic of China
See Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 400-01 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 926-27 (act of state involved the Cuban government’s act of expropriating the property of aliens located within Cuba); see also Republic of Iraq v. First Nat’l City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 , 51 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1027 , 86 S.Ct. 648 , 15 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966) (“when property confiscated is within the United States at the time of the attempted confiscation, our courts will give effect to acts of state ‘only if they are consistent with the policy and law of the United States.’ ” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Foreign Rel…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank
v.
Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue
v.
Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue
No. 865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1966.
Arthur B. Cunningham and Philip T. Weinstein for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Joseph M. Howard and John M. Brant for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.