green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of Parole
But, “[i]f predicated on facts that existed prior to the imposition of sentence, a motion under section 2255 may encompass ail the grounds that might be included in a habeas corpus petition.” Id.; see Stirone v. Markley, 345 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.) (grounds for motion to vacate sentence under § 2255 encompass all grounds that might be set up in an application for habeas corpus predicated on facts that existed at or prior to time of imposition of sentence), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 829 , 86 S.Ct. 67 , 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perkins v. Henderson
But, “[i]f predicated on facts that existed prior to the imposition of sentence, a motion under section 2255 may encompass all the grounds that might be included in a habeas corpus petition.” Id.; see Stirone v. Markley, 345 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.) (grounds for motion to vacate sentence under § 2255 encompass all grounds that might be set up in an application for habeas corpus predicated on facts that existed at or prior to time of imposition of sentence), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 829 , 86 S.Ct. 67 , 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. AMERICAN MUT. LIABILITY INS.
See also Ryder v. Insurance Co. of North America, 282 So.2d 771 (La.App. 3 Cir.1973). [6] See Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corp., et al, 170 So.2d 518 (La.App. 3 Cir.1965), writs refused, 247 La. 613 , 172 So.2d 700 (1965), appeal dismissed, Seacat Marine Drilling Co. v. Babineaux, 382 U.S. 16 , 86 S.Ct. 67 , 15 L.Ed.2d 12 (1965). [7] The claimant is now put to a true election of remedies by the addition of the language in Section 1225(D) which makes the payment of state compensation benefits "irreconcilable" with the payment of federal compensation benefits. [8] La.R.S. 23:1225(D) was r…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stirone
v.
Markley, Warden
v.
Markley, Warden
No. 284.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Lloyd F. Engle, Jr., and N. George Nasser for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Harold H. Greene for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.