green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Verni Ex Rel. Burstein v. STEVENS, INC.
See Downie v. U.S. Lines Co., 359 F. 2d 344, 347 (3d Cir.) (finding per se rule not feasible because of incalculable variables in attempting to place a value on life), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897 , 87 S.Ct. 201 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1966); In re Joint E. & S. Dist.
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzalo Sosa v. M/v Lago Izabal, Her Engines, Etc. And Tracey Navigation Co., Ltd., Tracey Navigation Co., Ltd.
Accord Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F.2d 344, 347 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897 , 87 S.Ct. 201 , 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willinger v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center
See Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F.2d 344 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897 , 87 S.Ct. 201 , 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966), (loss of eight years life expectancy); Schwartz v. United States, 230 *469 Thus, case law upholds the distinction between loss of life, in which case loss of life’s amenities is not compen-sable, and impairment of a living person’s faculties, in which instance such loss is recoverable. 4 Therefore, the lower court’s statement of the law was erroneous.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rummo v. Celotex Corp.
See, e.g., Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F.2d 344, 347 (3d Cir.) (rejecting English theory that shortening of life expectancy is per se a compensable element of damages), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897 , 87 S.Ct. 201 , 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966); Burke v. United States, 605 F.Supp. 981, 988 (D.Md.1985) (citing Maryland law in rejecting separate damages for shortened life expectancy as independent element of damages); Rhone v. Fisher, 224 Md. 223 , 167 A.2d 773, 778 (1961) (same) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit.
See, e.g., Downie v. United States Lines Co., 359 F.2d 344, 347 (3d Cir.) (rejecting English theory that shortening of life expectancy is per se a compensable element of damages), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 897 , 87 S.Ct. 201 , 17 L.Ed.2d 130 (1966); Burke v. United States, 605 F.Supp. 981, 988 (D.Md. 1985) (citing Maryland law in rejecting separate damages for shortened life expectancy as independent element of damages); Rhone v. Fisher, 224 Md. 223 , 167 A.2d 773, 778 (1961) (same) (citing cases).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 341.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1966.
Irving Abramson and Ruth Weyand for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board, and David L. Benetar for General Electric Co., respondents.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.