green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
American Cyanamid Co. v. Picaso-Anstalt
See Mobil Tankers Company v. Mene Grande Oil Company, 363 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.
See id. . 420 F.2d 423, 427 (3d Cir. 1970) (footnote omitted) (law of Netherlands Antilles involved); accord Mobil Tankers Co. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611, 615 (3d Cir.) (Venezuelan law), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966); Burt v. Isthmus Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company
From our review of the applicable choice of law rules, it appears that Pennsylvania law would apply to Defendant Piper and that Scottish law would apply to Defendant Hartzell. 479 F.Supp. at 734 48 See id 49 420 F.2d 423, 427 (3d Cir. 1970) (footnote omitted) (law of Netherlands Antilles involved); accord Mobil Tankers Co. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611, 615 (3d Cir.) (Venezuelan law), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966); Burt v. Isthmus Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Martel v. Inhabitants of Town of Old Orchard
(2×)
See Mobil Tankers Co. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966), 9 Moore's Federal Practice § 110.13(6) ("order dismissing an action for improper venue . . . is a final order and is appealable"); Annot., 49 A.L.R.2d 1036 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nathan George Dinitz
(2×)
See United States v. Higgins, 362 F.2d 462 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 316 , 17 L.Ed.2d 224 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,657 Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Ltd. v. Robert Maxwell, Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Limited v. Isidore Kerman
See to the same effect Mobil Tankers Co., S.A. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611, 614 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Maxwell
See to the same effect Mobil Tankers Co., S.A. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611, 614 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ricardo Fotys Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, S. A.
(2×)
See also Mobil Tankers Co., S.A. v. Mene Grande Oil Co., 363 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 318 , 17 L.Ed.2d 225 (1966); Spanos v. The Lily, 261 F.2d 214 (4th Cir., 1958); Kulukundis v. Strand, 202 F. 2d 708 (9th Cir., 1953); Bertel v. Panama Transport Co., 202 F.2d 247 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 834 , 74 S.Ct. 35 , 98 L.Ed. 356 (1953) 8 In San Pedro Compania Armadoras, S.A., supra, we observed that where the only evidence supporting a finding of contributory negligence was response to written interrogatories, the clearly erroneous rule "does not apply wih e…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Furtak
v.
Mancusi, Warden
v.
Mancusi, Warden
No. 813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1966.
385 U.S. 945
Published
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and for other relief denied.