green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
McCormick & Company, Inc. v. Empire Insurance Group, Allcity Insurance Company, Empire Mutual Insurance Company
See National Screen Service Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 364 F.2d 275, 279 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 394 , 17 L.Ed.2d 304 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
M.H. Lipiner & Son, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
See National Screen Service Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 364 F.2d 275, 279 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 394 , 17 L.Ed.2d 304 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
French American Banking Corp. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.
See National Screen Service Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp., 364 F.2d 275, 279 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 394 , 17 L.Ed.2d 304 (1966). 4 In opinions relied on by the plaintiff, two different state courts construed Insuring Agreement E or a like provision narrowly holding that the plaintiff’s loss was not caused by the forged documents; instead, these courts held, the loss was due to a bad business deal or credit risk.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Hot Shoppes, Inc.
v.
Hot Shoppes, Inc.
No. 586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 1966.
Petitioner pro se., John J. Carmody and Charles J. Steele for respondent.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.