green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. William A. Floyd
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 217 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Sullivan, 498 F.2d 146, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974); but see Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 804 (1st Cir.) (no violation if taking done for union purpose, even if act was unauthorized), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Foster
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); United States v. Keuylian, 602 F.2d 1033, 1040-41 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. Trotter, 529 F.2d 806 , 809 n. 3 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Heller, 527 F.2d 1173 (4th Cir.1975); United States v. Perry, 638 F.2d 862, 870 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Black, 525 F.2d 668, 669 (6th Cir.1975); United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846, 858 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 . 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); United States v. Wetzel, 514 F.2d 175, 177 (8th Cir…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Notarantonio, United States of America v. Edward Notorantonio, United States of America v. Inge Company Incorporated
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sten Thordarson, Martin Fry, Craig Dunbar, Martin Salgado, and Charles Wise
(2×)
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 798-99 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Doyle v. United States, 318 F.2d 419, 420-22 (8th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Andreen
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Woxberg v. United States, 329 F.2d 284 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 823 , 85 S.Ct. 45 , 13 L.Ed.2d 33 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Impac Ltd. v. Third National Bank
See First National Bank of Oakland v. Superior Court, 240 Cal.App.2d 109 , 49 Cal.Rptr. 358 (1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); Miller v. Mercantile National Bank of Hammond, 234 Ind. 202 , 125 N.E.2d 720 (1955); Kemple v. Security First National Bank of Los Angeles, 249 Cal.App.2d 719 , 57 Cal.Rptr. 838 (1967); Freeman Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Milton Silverman
See Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 , 798 n.4 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966), and the legislative history there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry Seidman
(2×)
Id. at 215 n. 4; see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 799 (1st Cir.) (“Embezzlement ... carries with it the concept of a breach of a fiduciary relationship.”), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Assada Abou-Saada, United States of America v. Milad K. El-Debeib, United States of America v. Antonious Tannous, United States of America v. Yacoub Fayad
United States v. Notarantonio, 758 F.2d 777, 788 (1st Cir.1985) (court must consider all the evidence in weighing 'sufficiency' if it reserves judgment on motion for acquittal made at close of government's case until the close of all the evidence); see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); cf. United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23-24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) (limited exception to this rule where codefendant's case impels defendant's presentation of e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abou-Saada
United States v. Notarantonio, 758 F.2d 777, 788 (1st Cir.1985) (court must consider all the evidence in weighing ‘sufficiency’ if it reserves judgment on motion for acquittal made at close of government's case until the close of all the evidence); see also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 802 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966); cf. United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23-24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) (limited exception to this rule where codefendant’s case impels defendant’s presentat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bane
See also Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966), where, at 802-3, the court stated: As to the latter motion, made at the conclusion of all the evidence, defendant asserts that there was insufficient evidence to justify a finding by the jury of criminal intent and conversion to defendant’s use.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
v.
First National Bank of Oakland
v.
First National Bank of Oakland
No. 269.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
Paul N. McCloskey and William I. Cohen for petitioners.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.