Umans v. United States, 389 U.S. 80 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Umans v. United States, 389 U.S. 80 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
227 citation events across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Anderson (utah, 1980-05-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" State v. Anderson (6×)
Utah · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2nd Cir.1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , reh. denied, 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed.2d 675 (1967).
examined Cited "see" In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso (3×)
N.J. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir.1966), cert. granted 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 872 (1967), dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 255 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 675 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F. 2d 996, 999-1000 (2 Cir.1966) (Friendly, J., dissenting); United States v. Arcuri, 282 F. Supp. 347, 349 (E.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir.1968), cert. den. 395 U.S. 913 , 89 S.Ct. 1760 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 227 (1969) (holding that an indictment based solely on hearsay evidence would be …
examined Cited "see" United States v. Sperling (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Nelson Cruz (3×)
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1966) (dicta), cert. granted, *411 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967); United States v. Malofsky, 388 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1017 , 88 S.Ct. 1273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 168 (1968), United States v. Leibowitz, 420 F.2d 39, 41-42 (2d Cir. 1969), 3 However, this “best evidence” rule has never been considered, even by that circuit, as a constitutional requirement.
examined Cited "see" United States v. Charles R. Harary (6×)
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 728-730 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Richard Beltram and Andres Colon (6×)
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 ( 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 ) (1967) (cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (U.S., Nov. 6, 1967)) ; United States v. Payton, 363 F.2d 996, 999 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 993 , ( 87 S.Ct. 606 , 17 L.Ed.2d 453 ) (1966).' United States v. Andrews, 381 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967). 14 The indictment in the present case was returned before the issuance of the decision in Umans.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Dutney
Mass. App. Ct. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d. 725, 728-730 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dism. 389 U. S. 80 (1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jerome DEUTSCH, Appellant
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 (1967).
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Angelo Russo (3×)
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Umans
v.
United States
41.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1967.
389 U.S. 80
Edward Brodsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William Esbitt., Sidney M. Glaser argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg.
Harlan, Marshall.
Cited by 71 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman’s opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.