green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. H.J. Ricks Construction Co.
(2×)
Hunt v. Leclede Gas Co. (1966), Mo., 406 S.W.2d 33, 38 ; accord, Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp. v. Henry (1967), Tex., 416 S.W.2d 390, 394 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 592 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 ; see also, Vest v. National Lead Co., (8th Cir.1972) 469 F.2d 256, 257 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riley v. Champion International Corp.
Compare Enserch Corp. v. Parker, 794 S.W.2d 2, 6 (Tex.1990) (stating that a premises owner “does not have a duty to see that an independent contractor performs work in a safe manner” unless the employer retains the right to control the contractor’s work) with Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp. v. Henry, 416 S.W.2d 390, 392 (Tex.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 592 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967) (holding that for purposes of premises liability, independent contractors are treated as invitees).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dugas
v.
Nippon Yusen Kaisha
v.
Nippon Yusen Kaisha
No. 721.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1967.
H. Alva Brumfield for petitioner., Arthur J. Mandell for American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.