Dugas v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha, 389 U.S. 1021 (1967). · Go Syfert
Dugas v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha, 389 U.S. 1021 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Howard v. H.J. Ricks Construction Co. (indctapp, 1987-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Howard v. H.J. Ricks Construction Co. (2×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: accord · confidence high
Hunt v. Leclede Gas Co. (1966), Mo., 406 S.W.2d 33, 38 ; accord, Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp. v. Henry (1967), Tex., 416 S.W.2d 390, 394 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 592 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 ; see also, Vest v. National Lead Co., (8th Cir.1972) 469 F.2d 256, 257 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Riley v. Champion International Corp.
E.D. Tex. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Enserch Corp. v. Parker, 794 S.W.2d 2, 6 (Tex.1990) (stating that a premises owner “does not have a duty to see that an independent contractor performs work in a safe manner” unless the employer retains the right to control the contractor’s work) with Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp. v. Henry, 416 S.W.2d 390, 392 (Tex.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 592 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967) (holding that for purposes of premises liability, independent contractors are treated as invitees).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dugas
v.
Nippon Yusen Kaisha
No. 721.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1967.
389 U.S. 1021
H. Alva Brumfield for petitioner., Arthur J. Mandell for American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.