green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
13.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re West Virginia Rezulin Litigation
(2×)
he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State ex rel. McCaffery v. Hutchison
(2×)
he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Emig v. American Tobacco Co.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); see also Harding, 165 F.R.D. at 629 ; Edgington v. R.G.
cited
Cited "see"
General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.
See Hobson v. Eaton, 399 F.2d 781 , 784 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1189 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Prudential Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Levitt v. Johnson, 334 F.2d 815, 819 (1st Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 961 , 85 S.Ct. 649 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965); Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 418 (2d Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Linton v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99-100 (10th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dirks v. Clayton Brokerage Co.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Masri v. Wakefield
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), in which the court of appeals stated “if there is an error made, let it be in favor and not against maintenance of the class action ...” Id. at 99. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dahl v. Gardner
(2×)
The doctrine of equitable tolling relied on by plaintiffs is “read into every federal statute of limitations.” Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946); see Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.), cert. den., 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Tallant
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,428
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Goldsmith
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 100 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Escott v. Barchris, 340 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 100 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Friedlander v. City of New York, 71 F.R.D. 546, 549 (S.D.N.Y.1976); Seiffer v. Topsy’s International, Inc., 64 F.R.D. 714, 719 (D.Kan.1974). 9 The next argument made by defendants is that individual questions of plaintiffs’ reliance preclude class certification.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan v. Amrep Corp.
(2×)
Accord, Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99-100 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Vernon J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neely v. United States
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969). 39 On the question of manageability the district court also expressed concern over the possible application of 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (a), 13 which requires that a refund claim be filed before a proceeding may be maintained to recover an internal revenue tax or penalty.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neely v. United States
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,657 Richard Hudson Share v. Air Properties G. Inc.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,208 Myron Harris v. American Investment Company
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 104-05 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); see also Chasins v. Smith, Barney & Co., 306 F.Supp. 177, 178 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (failure by broker to disclose his position as a market-maker).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandt v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F. 2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969) (class of over 200 securities purchasers sufficiently numerous); Citizens Banking Co. v. Monticello State Bank, 143 F.2d 261, 264 (8th Cir. 1944) (class of 40 note holders held sufficiently numerous); Fidelis Corp. v. Litton Industries, 293 F.Supp. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) (35 stockholders constitute a class in a securities fraud case). b) There are Questions of Law or Fact Common to the Class.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1973
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Philadelphia Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chatman v. Barnes
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 ; Cypress v. Newport News General & Nonsectarian Hosp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969) ; Philadelphia Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolfson v. Solomon
(2×)
Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 , 797 (2 Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); see Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99-100 (10 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Brown
Rev. 1295 (1970); see Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 22 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers Burgin
(2×)
See Esplin v. Hirschi, 10 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 94, 103 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (concerning the Investment Company Act in general); Brown v. Eastern States Corp., 4 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 26 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 864 , 71 S.Ct. 88 , 95 L.Ed. 631 (also concerning the Act in general) (by implication) ; Tanzer v. Huffines, D.Del., 1970, 314 F.Supp. 189, 193 ; Brown v. Bullock (district court opinion), ante.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
(2×)
See also Black Hawk Oil Co. v. Exxon Corp. , 1998 OK 70 969 P.2d 337 accord Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp ., 2010 OK 33 243 P.3d 1 Perry v. Meek , 1980 OK 151 618 P.2d 934 Esplin v. Hirschi , 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied , 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S. Ct. 1194 (1969)). ¶26 The district court found that TDS sells internet service based on speed and charges more to customers who contract for more speed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
(2×)
See also Black Hawk Oil Co. v. Exxon Corp. , 1998 OK 70 969 P.2d 337 accord Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp ., 2010 OK 33 243 P.3d 1 Perry v. Meek , 1980 OK 151 618 P.2d 934 Esplin v. Hirschi , 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied , 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S. Ct. 1194 (1969)). ¶26 The district court found that TDS sells internet service based on speed and charges more to customers who contract for more speed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Teta v. Michelle Chow
See, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 , 98 n.7 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 (1969) (explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements “is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors” (emphasis added)); see also Fed.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Teta v. Chow (In Re TWL Corp.)
(3×)
See, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 , 98 n.7 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 (1969) (explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements “is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors” (emphasis added)); see also Fed.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
(4×)
Accordingly, a class action “should lie unless it is clearly infeasible.” Riley, supra, 61 N.J. at 225 , 294 A.2d 7 ; see also Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir.1968) (“[I]f there is to be an error made, let it be in favor and not against the maintenance of the class action.”), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Langner v. Brown
(2×)
See also, Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Levitt v. Johnson, 334 F.2d 815, 819 (1st Cir.1964); Taussig v. Wellington Fund, 313 F.2d 472 , 476 (3d Cir1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963); Goodall v. Columbia Ventures, 374 F.Supp. 1324, 1328 (S.D.N.Y.1974); Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207, 245 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. en banc 1961). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
See Id. (citing Kahan v. Rosenstiel, 424 F.2d 161, 169 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 950 , 90 S.Ct. 1870 , 26 L.Ed.2d 290 (1970); see also Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonson v. Robertson
(2×)
See, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 98 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mularkey v. Holsum Bakery, Inc.
(2×)
See also Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (CA10 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 563 (CA2 1968), and Escott v. Barchris Construction Corp., 340 F.2d 731, 733 (CA2 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 816 , 86 S.Ct. 37 , 15 L.Ed.2d 63 (1966); 3B Moore and Kennedy, Moore’s Federal Practice 23.02[4] (1987) (“Rule 23 is a remedial rule to be liberally construed and applied.”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Storage Technology Corp. Securities Litigation
(2×)
See also Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
(2×)
R.3d 1088, 1101 (1970); see, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 418 (2d Cir.1961) (en banc); see also Krasner v. Dreyfus Corp., 500 F.Supp. 36, 37 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (application for approval of settlement in private action under Section 22 of ICA).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.
(2×)
Although numerous courts have- applied varying definitions to this requirement, the Court is satisfied with the standard that there must exist a “common nucleus of operative facts or law.” Payton v. Abbott Labs, 83 F.R.D. 382, 391 (D.Mass. 1979), vacated on other grounds, 100 F.R.D. 336 (1983); see also Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 99 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 271 F.Supp. 722, 726 (N.D.Cal.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brandon v. Chefetz
The rationale for the expansive Federal attitude lies in two distinct theories — ‘therapeutic benefits’ (McCall, Due Process and Consumer Protection: Concepts and Realities in Procedure and Substance-Class Action Issues, 25 Hastings LJ 1351; Hornstein, Legal Therapeutics: The ‘Salvage’ Factor in Counsel Fee Awards, 69 Harv L Rev 658, 662-663; see, e.g., Esplín v Hirschi, 402 F2d 94, 101, cert den 394 US 928 ; Green v Wolf Corp., supra, p 299; Berland v Mack, 48 FED 121, 125; Dolgow v Anderson, 43 FED 472, 485-488) and due process (see Boddie v Connecticut, 401 US 371 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Global Natural Resources, Inc.
(2×)
See e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101 (10th Cir. (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Steiner v. Equimark Corp., 96 F.R.D. 603, 607 (W.D.Pa.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herm v. Stafford
(2×)
See, e. g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101-02 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Lamb v. United Security Life Company, 59 F.R.D. 44, 46 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,681, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,335
(2×)
See, e. g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 101-02 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Lamb v. United Security Life Company, 59 F.R.D. 44, 46 (S.D.Iowa 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co.
(2×)
See e. g., Esplin v. Hirsch, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1968) (securities frauds cases); 4 H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.
The rationale for the expansive Federal attitude lies in two distinct theories—“therapeutic benefits” (McCall, Due Process and Consumer Protection: Concepts and Realities in Procedure and Substance-Class Action Issues, 25 Hastings LJ1351; Hornstein, Legal Therapeutics : The “Salvage” Factor in Counsel Fee Awards, 69 Harv L Rev 658, 662-663; see, e.g., Esplin v Hirschi, 402 F2d 94, 101, cert den 394 US 928 ; Green v Wolf Corp., supra, p 299; Berland v Mack, 48 FRD 121, 125; Dolgow v Anderson, 43 FRD 472, 485-488) and due process (see Boddie v Connecticut, 401 US 371 ).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Aldrich v. Mccullough Properties
(4×)
See, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.
(3×)
See, e.g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94, 103 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca5 1979
(2×)
See, e. g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 10 Cir. 1968, 402 F.2d 94, 99 , Cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Dolgow v. Anderson, E.D.N.Y.1971, 55 F.R.D. 664 , 667, Aff'd, 2 Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 437 . 51 Professor Newberg also considers tentative temporary settlement classes within the ambit of Rule 23.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meat Price Investigators Ass'n v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Esplin v. Hirschi, 10 Cir. 1968, 402 F.2d 94, 99 , cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Dolgow v. Anderson, E.D.N.Y.1971, 55 F.R.D. 664 , 667, aff’d, 2 Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 437 .
Esplin
v.
Hirschi et ux.
v.
Hirschi et ux.
No. 1013.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1969.
Hardin A. Whitney, Jr., for petitioners.
Granted, Should, White.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: West Virginia Supreme Court (4)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.